Website review, no card needed

4dayweek.com logo

4dayweek.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202639 issues · 84 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on 4dayweek.com, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.6 s3.6 sMay 16Oct 313.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.9 s
May 23, 20264.0 s
May 30, 20264.0 s
Jun 6, 20264.0 s
Jun 13, 20264.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.8 s
Jun 27, 20263.8 s
Jul 4, 20263.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.7 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.9 s
Aug 22, 20264.2 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 5, 20264.3 s
Sep 12, 20264.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.9 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.9 s
Oct 24, 20263.9 s
Oct 31, 20263.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
124 ms78 msMay 16Oct 3191 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026114 ms
May 23, 2026109 ms
May 30, 2026109 ms
Jun 6, 2026104 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026106 ms
Jun 27, 2026103 ms
Jul 4, 202698 ms
Jul 11, 202698 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202690 ms
Aug 1, 2026105 ms
Aug 8, 2026105 ms
Aug 15, 202683 ms
Aug 22, 2026106 ms
Aug 29, 2026102 ms
Sep 5, 2026111 ms
Sep 12, 2026119 ms
Sep 19, 2026106 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 2026100 ms
Oct 10, 202697 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms
Oct 24, 202695 ms
Oct 31, 202691 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of 4dayweek.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. 4dayweek.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. 4dayweek.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. 4dayweek.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. 4dayweek.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. 4dayweek.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. 4dayweek.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. 4dayweek.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. 4dayweek.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix53
  • Improve image delivery

    12.0 s · 2.4 MB

    9 images could be 2.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 12.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 643 KiB

    About 643 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Squarespace, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 1.8 MB and 761 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    610 ms · 129 KiB

    About 129 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 128 KiB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (128 KiB).

  • Squarespace adds 528 ms

    528 ms

    Squarespace costs a phone 528 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    450 ms · 116 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 116 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 852 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 197 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 22 ms

    22 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 22 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Real visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 30.5 s

    30.5 s

    Your largest element takes 30.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Home Video Fallback Image - 4DWG.png”.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.5 s

    30.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.11

    0.11

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 836 ms

    836 ms

    Real visitors wait 836 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 274 ms

    274 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 274 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 114 ms to 91 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix55
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB in 132 requests

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 132 requests on a phone: images 2.9 MB (22), scripts 1.6 MB (61) and stylesheets 180 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Home+Video+Fallback+Image+-+4DWG.png weighs 1.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.40 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.40 g of CO₂e: 168.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9197
  • 26 text elements with low contrast

    26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 29 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 3 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9282
  • Title is short (17 characters)

    Your title is only 17 characters: “4 Day Week Global”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (175 characters)

    Your meta description is 175 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (LocalBusiness and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: image is not an absolute URL ("//images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/66d46d86bd7db51794e…”.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 70 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 70 pages on 4dayweek.com and 17 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Redesign How Your Business Works With 4 Day Week Global”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.4dayweek.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.4dayweek.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (0 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,635 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix76
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    /home declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 8 pages share 4 titles

    / and /home all use the title “4 Day Week Global”, and 3 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 8 pages without a meta description

    /fast-track, /programs, /design-programs, /consulting, /reports and /research and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /about-us and /about use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 3 third-party cookies

    3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://data.stbuttons.click/data' from origin 'https://www.4dayweek.com' has been blocked…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 1,277 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,277 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “START NOW” and “Contact Us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and “2.5k+ Companies”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and HubSpot.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 32 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at 4dayweek.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Squarespace
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Squarespace

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on 4dayweek.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25