Website review, no card needed
aamedical.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202654 issues · 98 checks
This review found 54 issues worth fixing on aamedical.com, 28 of them high impact, across 98 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
50FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 10.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 10.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 10.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 9.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 9.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 9.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 8.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 8.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 8.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 8.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 8.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 8.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 8.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 8.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 8.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 8.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 8.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 8.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 8.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 8.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 8.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 9.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 9.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 9.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 9.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 262 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 251 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 261 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 229 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 236 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.8 s
2.7 s
3.5 s
4.4 s
5.3 s
6.2 s
7.1 s
aamedical.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
11.6 s · 2.4 MB45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.4 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.8 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
17,430 HTML elements
The page has 17,430 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 16
16/100Your mobile performance score is 16 (desktop: 25). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.2 s
A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
910 ms · 205 KiBAbout 205 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 910 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 987 KiB and 775 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 267 KiB20 images could be 267 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 493 ms
493 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 493 ms of main-thread work and 563 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
350 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 346 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 10.3 s
10.3 sReal visitors wait 10.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.62
0.62For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.62 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 4.4 s
4.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.3 s
19.3 sYour largest element takes 19.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 27.1 s
27.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.854
0.854The layout shifts by 0.854 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 9.4 s
9.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 322 ms
322 msReal visitors wait 322 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 10.1 s to 9.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 262 ms to 236 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.5 MB in 135 requests
4.5 MBYour homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 135 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (31), fonts 1.3 MB (6) and images 590 KiB (64). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.28 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.28 g of CO₂e: 154.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (3 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
1 checks passed
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No page title
Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
6 links crawlers can't follow
6 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
2 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.aamedicalstore.com/sitemap_aams.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 275 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187212406&Ver=2&mid=7eda91c4-07b0-47a1-a32c-b65cedd4cd74&bo=1&sid=98a21680cc2b11f1b445cb5fa731e792&vid=98a22d60cc2b11f1aff837f0672350a4&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.
25 small tap targets
25 of 42 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.
6 distorted images
6 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
3 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://aamedical.com goes through 3 redirects before the homepage loads.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (aamedicalstore.com).
Valid certificate (28 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for aamedical.com and is valid for another 28 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://aamedical.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
aamedicalstore.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
aamedicalstore.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 14 years old
14 yearsaamedicalstore.com was registered in Apr 2012 through Bluehost Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Apr 2033
aamedicalstore.com is registered until Apr 2033.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 275 words of copy
The homepage carries about 275 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Subscribe”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 54 issues on aamedical.com, including 26 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.