Website review, no card needed

aamlive.com logo

aamlive.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202659 issues · 113 checks

This review found 59 issues worth fixing on aamlive.com, 20 of them high impact, across 113 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.8 s2.9 sMay 9Oct 243.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.4 s
May 16, 20263.9 s
May 23, 20263.8 s
May 30, 20263.8 s
Jun 6, 20264.6 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.4 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.5 s
Jul 25, 20263.5 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.6 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.7 s
Sep 5, 20263.7 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Oct 24, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
85 ms60 msJun 6Oct 2463 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 6, 202682 ms
Jun 13, 202677 ms
Jun 20, 202673 ms
Jun 27, 202671 ms
Jul 4, 202670 ms
Jul 11, 202670 ms
Jul 18, 202666 ms
Jul 25, 202671 ms
Aug 1, 202670 ms
Aug 8, 202670 ms
Aug 15, 202671 ms
Aug 22, 202669 ms
Aug 29, 202671 ms
Sep 5, 202671 ms
Sep 12, 202671 ms
Sep 19, 202670 ms
Sep 26, 202668 ms
Oct 3, 202666 ms
Oct 10, 202668 ms
Oct 17, 202664 ms
Oct 24, 202663 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of aamlive.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. aamlive.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. aamlive.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. aamlive.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. aamlive.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. aamlive.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. aamlive.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. aamlive.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. aamlive.com at 3.1 s3.1 s

aamlive.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix38
  • Render-blocking requests

    5.8 s

    45 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.0 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 35). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 2.0 MB

    8 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Adroll and others), adding 1.6 MB and 993 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 737 ms

    737 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 737 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 125 KiB

    About 125 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 24 KiB

    24 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    200 ms · 46 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (46 KiB).

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 166 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 21 ms

    21 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.43

    0.43

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.43 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.6 s

    18.6 s

    Your largest element takes 18.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “AAM is becoming GreenOak. Five specialist investment firms.…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.7 s

    35.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.2 s

    8.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.274

    0.274

    The layout shifts by 0.274 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 984 ms

    984 ms

    Real visitors wait 984 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 260 ms

    260 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 260 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 63 ms

    63 ms

    Real visitors wait 63 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 82 ms to 63 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 7.3 MB in 182 requests

    7.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.3 MB in 182 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (54), scripts 2.4 MB (65) and fonts 1.6 MB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    resource_center_small.jpg weighs 1.7 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    1.0 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example resource_center_small.jpg at 1,603 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 1.0 MB.

  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (2.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (2.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.07 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.07 g of CO₂e: 248.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 6482
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    2 dropdowns have no label.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (3 elements)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 16 images without alt text

    16 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 8 form fields without a label

    8 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 7573
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 5 H1 headlines

    There are 5 <h1> headlines (“”, “AAM is becoming GreenOak.Five specialist investme…” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (307 characters)

    Your meta description is 307 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.aamlive.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 182 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 182 pages on aamlive.com and 11 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Title: 36 characters

    Your title is a healthy 36 characters: “AAM Home | Advisors Asset Management”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,122 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    /ETF and /ETF/strategic-partners all use the title “Exchange-Traded Funds | Advisors Asset Management”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages share a meta description

    /aboutus/contactus, /publicsite/sales-and-distribution-services, /publicsite/alternative-investments-partners, /resource-center/alts, /alternative-investments/offerings/WPAFX and /ETF/fund-materials and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /alternative-investments/offerings/WPAFX and /fixedincome/portfolio-analytics have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 88 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6983
  • 13 small tap targets

    13 of 29 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://ssl.google-analytics.com/j/__utm.gif?utmwv=5.7.2&utms=1&utmn=273093780&utmhn=www.aamlive.com&utm…”.

  • 4 distorted images

    4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • HTTP/1.1 only

    The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

  • 2 links through redirect chains

    2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.aamlive.com/publicsite/login.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (aamlive.com).

  • Valid certificate (159 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 verifies for aamlive.com and is valid for another 159 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://aamlive.com redirects to the secure version.

  • All 51 links work

    All 51 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 11 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    aamlive.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    aamlive.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 16 years old

    16 years

    aamlive.com was registered in Feb 2010 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Feb 2027

    aamlive.com is registered until Feb 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 7 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 310 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 310 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “CONTACT US”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx ip4:216.110.59.0/24 ip4:8.48.86.0/24 ip4:20.118.24.155/32 ip4:54.203.18.106/32 include:us._netblocks.mimecast…”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 29 cookies set on arrival

    29

    Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 59 issues on aamlive.com, including 21 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25