Website review, no card needed
aapc.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202641 issues · 85 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on aapc.com, 18 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 278 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 277 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 275 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 273 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 271 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 236 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
8.1 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 454 KiB28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (454 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 25
25/100Your mobile performance score is 25 (desktop: 69). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Hubspot and Intercom and others), adding 4.5 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Hubspot adds 340 ms
340 msHubspot costs a phone 340 ms of main-thread work and 2.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 437 ms
437 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 437 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Intercom adds 241 ms
241 msIntercom costs a phone 241 ms of main-thread work and 296 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 222 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
43 KiB1 image could be 43 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
39 KiBAbout 39 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 69 but mobile only 25. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.33
0.33For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.33 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 9.5 s
9.5 sThe first text or image appears after 9.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 32.1 s
32.1 sYour largest element takes 32.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “50% Off + FREE Unlimited Exam”.
Time to Interactive: 32.3 s
32.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.3 s
10.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.3
0.3The layout shifts by 0.3 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 618 ms
618 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 618 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 191 ms
191 msReal visitors wait 191 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 15% faster for real visitors
-15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 279 ms to 236 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.0 MB in 123 requests
6.0 MBYour homepage downloads 6.0 MB in 123 requests on a phone: images 3.1 MB (32), scripts 2.2 MB (60) and other files 425 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images in older formats
3 images (2.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.69 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.69 g of CO₂e: 202.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
4 images without alt text
4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
29 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 29 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.
6 links crawlers can't follow
6 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
166 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 166 pages on aapc.com and 15 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 118 characters
Your meta description is 118 characters: “The nation's largest medical coding training and certification association for medical coders and medical coding jobs.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “medical coding”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Medical Coding - Medical Billing - Medical Auditing - AAPC”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.aapc.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.aapc.com/medical-coding-books.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,208 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.aapc.com/llms.txt (135 KiB, 578 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/medical-coding and https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/coding all use the title “Medical Coding Resources Help for Healthcare Professionals - AAPC”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/medical-coding and https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/coding use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/coding, whose canonical is https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/medical-coding. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
14 pages without an H1
https://www.aapc.com/certifications/cpc, https://www.aapc.com/certifications/cpb, https://www.aapc.com/certifications/cpma, https://www.aapc.com/certifications/cppm, https://www.aapc.com/certifications/cpco and https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/medical-coding and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages with very little text
https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/medical-coding, https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/medical-billing, https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/medical-auditing, https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/healthcare-compliance, https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/practice-management and https://www.aapc.com/resources/t/coding have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 121 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=26024652&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=2e6f164d-08e7-4b5d-805b-cf6a811c681c&bo=2&sid=9d38ab80c5cf11f1ba5fb764aacbaa3b&vid=9d38dcd0c5cf11f1891eb139a46c2be2&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
22 small tap targets
22 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: “Over 300,000 Members”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 9-field form
Your longest form asks for 9 fields (5 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
Only about 182 words
The homepage has only about 182 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
13 calls to action
The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Join Us Today”, “Get Started” and “Sign Up”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
21 cookies set on arrival
21Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
40 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 40 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at aapc.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Segment
Company
- Founded
- 1988
- Headquarters
- Salt Lake City
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on aapc.com, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.