Website review, no card needed

accell.com logo

accell.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202642 issues · 107 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on accell.com, 10 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.6 sMay 2Oct 171.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.7 s
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
75 ms65 msMay 2Oct 1771 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202670 ms
May 9, 202670 ms
May 16, 202670 ms
May 23, 202666 ms
May 30, 202669 ms
Jun 6, 202670 ms
Jun 13, 202671 ms
Jun 20, 202673 ms
Jun 27, 202674 ms
Jul 4, 202673 ms
Jul 11, 202673 ms
Jul 18, 202673 ms
Jul 25, 202673 ms
Aug 1, 202671 ms
Aug 8, 202669 ms
Aug 15, 202669 ms
Aug 22, 202669 ms
Aug 29, 202669 ms
Sep 5, 202669 ms
Sep 12, 202672 ms
Sep 19, 202672 ms
Sep 26, 202673 ms
Oct 3, 202671 ms
Oct 10, 202670 ms
Oct 17, 202671 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of accell.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. accell.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. accell.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. accell.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. accell.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. accell.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. accell.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. accell.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. accell.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

accell.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix51
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 740 KiB

    About 740 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    250 ms · 563 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (563 KiB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Optanon and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.6 MB and 653 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    460 ms · 145 KiB

    About 145 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 460 ms faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 424 ms

    424 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 424 ms of main-thread work and 979 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    310 ms · 16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    250 ms · 22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 163 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    149 KiB

    1 image could be 149 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 76 but mobile only 51. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 994 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Your largest element takes 6.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We (Accell Group N.V.) use cookies to improve your experien…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.5 s

    14.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.19

    0.19

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.19 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.243

    0.243

    The layout shifts by 0.243 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 247 ms

    247 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 247 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 70 ms to 71 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Real visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 604 ms

    604 ms

    Real visitors wait 604 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 62 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 62 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (19), images 504 KiB (15) and fonts 192 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (294 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.62 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.62 g of CO₂e: 74.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9191
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (18 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 18 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9275
  • Title is long (124 characters)

    Your title is 124 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Accell Group - The Premier Cycle Group - Accell Group,Accell,Koga,Batavus,Lapierre,Seattl…”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (209 characters)

    Your meta description is 209 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 27 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 27 pages on accell.com and 2 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “ACCELL”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.accell-group.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (432 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix74
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /en/privacy-statement is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 7 pages share a title

    /en/news, /en/news/news-2/accell-granted-suspension-of-payments, /en/news/news-2/accell-completes-transformation-and-sees-strong-momentum-with-integrated-platform-and-focused-brand-portfolio, /en/news/news-2/accell-secures-additional-funding-and-realises-debt-reduction, /en/news/news-2/van-nicholas-sold-to-italian-bike-manufacturer-velo-ce and /en/news/news-2/accell-advances-transformation-plan-with-heerenveen-site-changes and 1 other all use the title “Accell Group - The Premier Cycle Group - Accell Group,Accell,Koga,Bat…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 14 pages share a meta description

    /en/about-us, /en/our-brands, /en/news, /en/speak-up, /en/general-terms-conditions and /en/news/news-2/accell-granted-suspension-of-payments and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /en/about-us, whose canonical is /en/about-us/profile. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /en/news, /en/news/news-2 and /en/media-kit have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 pages with very little text

    /en/general-terms-conditions, /en/news/news-2/accell-granted-suspension-of-payments, /en/news/news-2/accell-completes-transformation-and-sees-strong-momentum-with-integrated-platform-and-focused-brand-portfolio, /en/news/news-2/accell-secures-additional-funding-and-realises-debt-reduction, /en/news/news-2/van-nicholas-sold-to-italian-bike-manufacturer-velo-ce and /en/media-kit have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 14 internal pages checked

    We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 14 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 6288
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “dataLayer is not defined”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    22 of 25 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://accell.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.accell-group.com/en/about-us.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (accell-group.com).

  • Valid certificate (119 days left)

    The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36 verifies for accell.com and is valid for another 119 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://accell.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 18 links work

    All 18 links checked from your homepage (16 internal, 2 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    accell-group.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 28 years old

    28 years

    accell-group.com was registered in Jul 1998 through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    accell-group.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Jul 2027

    accell-group.com is registered until Jul 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 258 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 258 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.accell_com._d.easydmarc.pro -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
Snakeware New Media B.V., e-mail: [email], interne
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 42 issues on accell.com, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25