Website review, no card needed

accely.com logo

accely.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202628 issues · 101 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on accely.com, 12 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.6 s3.2 sMay 2Oct 173.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.5 s
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.9 s
Jun 6, 20263.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.0 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.3 s
Jul 4, 20264.5 s
Jul 11, 20264.5 s
Jul 18, 20264.4 s
Jul 25, 20264.3 s
Aug 1, 20264.2 s
Aug 8, 20264.2 s
Aug 15, 20264.1 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20264.0 s
Sep 5, 20264.2 s
Sep 12, 20264.2 s
Sep 19, 20264.3 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Oct 17, 20263.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
161 ms125 msMay 2Oct 17140 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026140 ms
May 9, 2026147 ms
May 16, 2026157 ms
May 23, 2026152 ms
May 30, 2026155 ms
Jun 6, 2026151 ms
Jun 13, 2026144 ms
Jun 20, 2026140 ms
Jun 27, 2026140 ms
Jul 4, 2026133 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026136 ms
Jul 25, 2026135 ms
Aug 1, 2026135 ms
Aug 8, 2026138 ms
Aug 15, 2026138 ms
Aug 22, 2026139 ms
Aug 29, 2026139 ms
Sep 5, 2026148 ms
Sep 12, 2026151 ms
Sep 19, 2026151 ms
Sep 26, 2026151 ms
Oct 3, 2026143 ms
Oct 10, 2026136 ms
Oct 17, 2026140 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of accely.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. accely.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. accely.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  3. accely.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  4. accely.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  5. accely.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  6. accely.com at 8.0 s8.0 s
  7. accely.com at 9.3 s9.3 s
  8. accely.com at 10.6 s10.6 s

accely.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

5 to fix65
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.3 s · 674 KiB

    38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (674 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • 5,139 HTML elements

    The page has 5,139 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 65

    65/100

    Your mobile performance score is 65 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 118 KiB

    2 images could be 118 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 28 KiB

    About 28 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 91 but mobile only 65. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Cloudflare), adding 10 KiB and 7 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 152 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.3 s

    12.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Your largest element takes 5.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is element render delay (9.7 s).

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 5.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 140 ms to 140 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 140 ms

    140 ms

    Real visitors wait 140 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 1 image far larger than shown

    61 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Global-f-1.jpg at 563 px wide, shown at 20 px. Resized copies would save about 61 KiB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (167 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.25 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.25 g of CO₂e: 30.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 921 KiB in 42 requests

    921 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 921 KiB in 42 requests on a phone: images 435 KiB (16), fonts 317 KiB (2) and stylesheets 81 KiB (17). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8491
  • 238 text elements with low contrast

    238 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (32 elements)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 294 links without text

    294 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 17 form fields without a label

    17 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (6 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 379 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10092
  • Meta description is long (200 characters)

    Your meta description is 200 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 545 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 545 pages on accely.com and 16 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Redefining SAP Consulting for the AI Era”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Accely - SAP Consulting Company | End-to-End SAP Services”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.accely.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Corporation, LocalBusiness, Organization and VideoObject.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.accely.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, Google-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (6,044 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (195 KiB, 355 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 197 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 41 small tap targets

    41 of 189 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix81
  • 1 broken link to your own pages

    1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.accely.com/products/intelligent-character-recognition-software/ (404).

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (accely.com).

  • Valid certificate (54 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for accely.com and is valid for another 54 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://accely.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    accely.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    accely.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 15 years old

    15 years

    accely.com was registered in Aug 2011 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Aug 2030

    accely.com is registered until Aug 2030.

Content and conversion

1 to fix95
  • A 9-field form

    Your longest form asks for 9 fields (8 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 657 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 657 words of visible text.

9 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Talk to an SAP expert”.

  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Talk to an SAP expert” and “Download corporate profile”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 21 testimonial or review blocks, 30 customer or partner logos and 8 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 6 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:216.14.120.68 ip4:103.11.86.217 ip4:103.11.86.218 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 6.5.2; the current release is 7.1.3.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 6.5.2
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 28 issues on accely.com, including 13 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25