Website review, no card needed
accessibe.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202638 issues · 105 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on accessibe.com, 16 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 424 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 430 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 433 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 434 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 441 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 441 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 441 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 441 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 433 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 447 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 444 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 439 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 432 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 423 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 426 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 420 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 401 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 397 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 405 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 419 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 455 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 470 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 511 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 541 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 547 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.1 s
A phone's processor spends 9.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,068 HTML elements
The page has 3,068 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ZenDesk and VWO and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
740 ms · 917 KiBAbout 917 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 740 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
750 ms · 444 KiB10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (444 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 857 ms
857 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 857 ms of main-thread work and 533 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
ZenDesk adds 325 ms
325 msZenDesk costs a phone 325 ms of main-thread work and 508 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 343 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
213 KiB4 images could be 213 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
18 KiB18 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 38 ms
38 msYour server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 588 ms
588 msReal visitors wait 588 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 19.4 s
19.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s
1.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 8.6 s
8.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sYour largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Web accessibility tailored for your business”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors
+27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 424 ms to 547 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
19 images without width and height
19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.047
0.047The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.047, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.1 MB in 304 requests
4.1 MBYour homepage downloads 4.1 MB in 304 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (65), media 1.0 MB (2) and images 329 KiB (36). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.16 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.16 g of CO₂e: 139.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
6 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 125 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 5 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (161 characters)
Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
127 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 127 pages on accessibe.com and 20 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Web accessibility tailored for your business”.
Title: 35 characters
Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Web Accessibility Platform for WCAG”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://accessibe.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://accessibe.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,142 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (17 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page slow to respond
/gen-ai took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 59 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=26089094&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=0988fbe1-d776-4251-874e-4dbe79fd5f06&bo=1&sid=2a8312e0d7d711f1b418ab3075d5fbaf&vid=2a830ef0d7d711f1b20ab9702c1fee99&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
5 small tap targets
5 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
2 links through redirect chains
2 links go through two or more redirects, for example http://support.accessibe.com/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (accessibe.com).
Valid certificate (43 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for accessibe.com and is valid for another 43 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://accessibe.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 53 links work
All 53 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 13 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
accessibe.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
accessibe.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 8 years old
8 yearsaccessibe.com was registered in Aug 2018 through eNom, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Aug 2031
accessibe.com is registered until Aug 2031.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 639 words of copy
The homepage carries about 639 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK A DEMO” and “START FREE TRIAL”.
19 calls to action
The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Community Join the accessiBe community”, “Pricing” and “Book a demo”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 34 testimonial or review blocks, 6 customer or partner logos and 6 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Mixpanel.
Email authentication
SPF does not block other senders (no all)
Your SPF record doesn't end in -all or ~all, so it doesn't stop other servers sending as you: “v=spf1 redirect=accessibe.com.hosted.spf-report.com”.
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
29 cookies set on arrival
29Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
43 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 43 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Usercentrics
A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Mixpanel
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Hiring
- Hiring
- 4 open roles
- Teams
- Marketing (1), PMO (1), Product Design (1), Product Marketing (1)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- accessibe.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Company
- Founded
- 2018
- Headquarters
- Tel Aviv
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on accessibe.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.