Website review, no card needed

accessibe.com logo

accessibe.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202638 issues · 105 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on accessibe.com, 16 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s2.6 sMay 16Oct 313.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.4 s
Jun 6, 20263.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Oct 31, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
570 ms375 msMay 16Oct 31547 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026424 ms
May 23, 2026430 ms
May 30, 2026433 ms
Jun 6, 2026434 ms
Jun 13, 2026441 ms
Jun 20, 2026441 ms
Jun 27, 2026441 ms
Jul 4, 2026441 ms
Jul 11, 2026433 ms
Jul 18, 2026447 ms
Jul 25, 2026444 ms
Aug 1, 2026439 ms
Aug 8, 2026432 ms
Aug 15, 2026423 ms
Aug 22, 2026426 ms
Aug 29, 2026420 ms
Sep 5, 2026401 ms
Sep 12, 2026397 ms
Sep 19, 2026405 ms
Sep 26, 2026419 ms
Oct 3, 2026455 ms
Oct 10, 2026470 ms
Oct 17, 2026511 ms
Oct 24, 2026541 ms
Oct 31, 2026547 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

10 to fix45
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,068 HTML elements

    The page has 3,068 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ZenDesk and VWO and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    740 ms · 917 KiB

    About 917 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 740 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 444 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (444 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 857 ms

    857 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 857 ms of main-thread work and 533 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ZenDesk adds 325 ms

    325 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 325 ms of main-thread work and 508 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 343 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    213 KiB

    4 images could be 213 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 49 KiB

    About 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    18 KiB

    18 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 38 ms

    38 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 588 ms

    588 ms

    Real visitors wait 588 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.4 s

    19.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Your largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Web accessibility tailored for your business”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 424 ms to 547 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 19 images without width and height

    19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.047

    0.047

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.047, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.1 MB in 304 requests

    4.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.1 MB in 304 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (65), media 1.0 MB (2) and images 329 KiB (36). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.16 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.16 g of CO₂e: 139.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9193
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    6 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 125 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 5 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • Meta description is long (161 characters)

    Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 127 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 127 pages on accessibe.com and 20 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Web accessibility tailored for your business”.

  • Title: 35 characters

    Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Web Accessibility Platform for WCAG”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://accessibe.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://accessibe.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,142 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (17 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 1 page slow to respond

    /gen-ai took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 59 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=26089094&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=0988fbe1-d776-4251-874e-4dbe79fd5f06&bo=1&sid=2a8312e0d7d711f1b418ab3075d5fbaf&vid=2a830ef0d7d711f1b20ab9702c1fee99&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.

  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • 2 links through redirect chains

    2 links go through two or more redirects, for example http://support.accessibe.com/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (accessibe.com).

  • Valid certificate (43 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for accessibe.com and is valid for another 43 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://accessibe.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 53 links work

    All 53 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 13 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    accessibe.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    accessibe.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 8 years old

    8 years

    accessibe.com was registered in Aug 2018 through eNom, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Aug 2031

    accessibe.com is registered until Aug 2031.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 639 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 639 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK A DEMO” and “START FREE TRIAL”.

  • 19 calls to action

    The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Community Join the accessiBe community”, “Pricing” and “Book a demo”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 34 testimonial or review blocks, 6 customer or partner logos and 6 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Mixpanel.

Email authentication

1 to fix85
  • SPF does not block other senders (no all)

    Your SPF record doesn't end in -all or ~all, so it doesn't stop other servers sending as you: “v=spf1 redirect=accessibe.com.hosted.spf-report.com”.

  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 29 cookies set on arrival

    29

    Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 43 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 43 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Mixpanel
Hosting
Cloudflare

Hiring

Hiring
4 open roles
Teams
Marketing (1), PMO (1), Product Design (1), Product Marketing (1)
Job board
greenhouse

Company

Founded
2018
Headquarters
Tel Aviv

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on accessibe.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25