Website review, no card needed

activ.eg logo

activ.eg website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202641 issues · 96 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on activ.eg, 16 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 10.2 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.5 sApr 25Oct 101.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20261.5 s
May 2, 20261.5 s
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
422 ms198 msApr 25Oct 10396 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026224 ms
May 2, 2026226 ms
May 9, 2026228 ms
May 16, 2026240 ms
May 23, 2026254 ms
May 30, 2026262 ms
Jun 6, 2026267 ms
Jun 13, 2026264 ms
Jun 20, 2026258 ms
Jun 27, 2026262 ms
Jul 4, 2026271 ms
Jul 11, 2026287 ms
Jul 18, 2026295 ms
Jul 25, 2026306 ms
Aug 1, 2026318 ms
Aug 8, 2026336 ms
Aug 15, 2026355 ms
Aug 22, 2026363 ms
Aug 29, 2026373 ms
Sep 5, 2026376 ms
Sep 12, 2026378 ms
Sep 19, 2026389 ms
Sep 26, 2026392 ms
Oct 3, 2026392 ms
Oct 10, 2026396 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of activ.eg (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. activ.eg at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. activ.eg at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. activ.eg at 3.7 s3.7 s
  4. activ.eg at 5.0 s5.0 s
  5. activ.eg at 6.2 s6.2 s
  6. activ.eg at 7.5 s7.5 s
  7. activ.eg at 8.7 s8.7 s
  8. activ.eg at 9.9 s9.9 s

activ.eg does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix49
  • Main-thread work: 10.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 9,816 HTML elements

    The page has 9,816 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 824 KiB

    35 images could be 824 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (TikTok, reddit and Facebook and others), adding 1.1 MB and 712 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    404 KiB

    About 404 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 262 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • tidio.co adds 94 ms

    94 ms

    tidio.co costs a phone 94 ms of main-thread work and 514 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    137 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (137 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    32 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 29 ms

    29 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.8 s

    15.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 982 ms

    982 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 982 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 75% slower for real visitors

    +75%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 224 ms to 396 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 893 ms

    893 ms

    Real visitors wait 893 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix60
  • Page weight: 6.1 MB in 185 requests

    6.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 185 requests on a phone: media 2.7 MB (3), images 1.2 MB (54) and scripts 1.1 MB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Replacing_clothing_and_shoes_in_2K_20260922100610.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    96 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 8_afa57129-ceee-4765-a2ee-8b6db6ed31ce.png at 389 px wide, shown at 64 px. Resized copies would save about 96 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (35 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.72 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.72 g of CO₂e: 206.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8793
  • 33 text elements with low contrast

    33 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8574
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (5 characters)

    Your title is only 5 characters: “Activ”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 264 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 264 pages on activ.eg and 0 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://activ.eg/en.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://activ.eg/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,893 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /en/collections/back-to-school, /en/collections/socks, /en/collections/bag, /en/collections/%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%B0%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B3, /en/collections/boards and /en/collections/%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%B7%D9%84%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%A3%D8%B7%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /en/collections/%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%B0%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B3, whose canonical is /en/collections/%d8%a7%d8%ad%d8%b0%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d9%85%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%b3. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 109 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 83 small tap targets

    83 of 168 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://activ.eg/customer_authentication/redirect?locale=en&region_country=EG.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (activ.eg).

  • Valid certificate (85 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for activ.eg and is valid for another 85 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://activ.eg redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 40 links work

    All 40 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    activ.eg has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,662 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,662 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Login / Register”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 190 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Hotjar.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Email authentication

2 to fix35
  • No DMARC policy

    activ.eg has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 35/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:zoho.com include:emailsrvr.com ~all”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 21 cookies set on arrival

    21

    Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 26 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Hotjar

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 41 issues on activ.eg, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25