Website review, no card needed
actoverco.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202640 issues · 108 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on actoverco.com, 15 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79C- #37,747 of 85,112 reviewed websitesbeats 50%
- #22,657 of 43,247 online storesbeats 42%
- #590 of 2,130 WooCommerce storesbeats 68%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 107 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 137 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
3.4 s · 1.2 MB14 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.6 s46 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.6 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
900 ms · 161 KiBAbout 161 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 66
66/100Your mobile performance score is 66 (desktop: 73). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
650 ms · 115 KiB10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (115 KiB).
Font display
550 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).
1,613 HTML elements
The page has 1,613 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, Yandex Metrica and aparat.com), adding 99 KiB and 124 ms of main-thread time.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 61 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
36 KiBAbout 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
7 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 903 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 35 ms
35 msYour server sent the HTML in 35 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.1 s
5.1 sReal visitors wait 5.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.3 s
24.3 sYour largest element takes 24.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “سماکتو - آمپول لاغری سماگلوتاید اکتوورکو”.
Time to Interactive: 24.5 s
24.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.9 s
7.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors
+27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 109 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 131 ms
131 msReal visitors wait 131 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 20 ms
20 msScripts block the page for only 20 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.4 MB in 159 requests
6.4 MBYour homepage downloads 6.4 MB in 159 requests on a phone: images 4.8 MB (46), fonts 947 KiB (4) and scripts 503 KiB (48). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images far larger than shown
1.3 MB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example banner-Tirzacto-01-scaled.png at 2,560 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.3 MB.
15 images in older formats
15 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.80 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.80 g of CO₂e: 216.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
10 links without text
10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (17 characters)
Your title is only 17 characters: “داروسازی اکتوورکو”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
143 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 143 pages on actoverco.com and 15 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 139 characters
Your meta description is 139 characters: “داروسازی اکتوورکو تولید کننده داروهای بیماری های دیابت، قلب و عروق، مغز و اعصاب، تنفسی، گوارشی، زنان، عفونی، کلیه و مجا…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “گروه دارویی اکتوور”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.actoverco.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, MedicalOrganization, Organization and Person.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.actoverco.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Other pages
15 pages without an H1
/about-us, /salamsalamat, /contact-us-3, /history-of-establishment, /actoverco-and-covid and /goals-and-strategies and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 pages with very little text
/about-us, /salamsalamat, /contact-us-3, /history-of-establishment, /actoverco-and-covid and /goals-and-strategies and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
6 pages slow to respond
/about-us, /actoverco-and-covid, /goals-and-strategies, /export-holding-in-the-field-of-export, /introduction-to-food-group and /introduction-of-production-and-research-sites took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 57 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
21 small tap targets
21 of 41 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Certificate expires in 13 days
Your certificate from Asseco Data Systems S.A. · Certum DV TLS G2 R39 CA expires in 13 days. If it doesn't renew automatically, visitors get a security warning.
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (actoverco.com).
http:// redirects to https
http://actoverco.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 53 links work
All 53 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 13 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
actoverco.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
actoverco.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 23 years old
23 yearsactoverco.com was registered in Mar 2003 through CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH d/b/a joker.com. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Mar 2029
actoverco.com is registered until Mar 2029.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Only about 56 words
The homepage has only about 56 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
5 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 6 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:81.12.97.90 -all”.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Microsoft Clarity and Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 40 issues on actoverco.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.