Website review, no card needed

adacap.com logo

adacap.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202631 issues · 102 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on adacap.com, 11 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s1.8 sMay 16Oct 312.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Oct 31, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
221 ms192 msMay 16Oct 31212 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026195 ms
May 23, 2026202 ms
May 30, 2026204 ms
Jun 6, 2026209 ms
Jun 13, 2026208 ms
Jun 20, 2026204 ms
Jun 27, 2026210 ms
Jul 4, 2026208 ms
Jul 11, 2026208 ms
Jul 18, 2026208 ms
Jul 25, 2026205 ms
Aug 1, 2026207 ms
Aug 8, 2026211 ms
Aug 15, 2026212 ms
Aug 22, 2026213 ms
Aug 29, 2026215 ms
Sep 5, 2026212 ms
Sep 12, 2026215 ms
Sep 19, 2026218 ms
Sep 26, 2026215 ms
Oct 3, 2026217 ms
Oct 10, 2026214 ms
Oct 17, 2026211 ms
Oct 24, 2026211 ms
Oct 31, 2026212 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of adacap.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. adacap.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. adacap.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. adacap.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. adacap.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. adacap.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. adacap.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. adacap.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. adacap.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

adacap.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix54
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.4 s · 461 KiB

    About 461 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.7 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.2 s · 186 KiB

    About 186 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    7.8 MB

    7 images could be 7.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 927 KiB

    37 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (927 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and Cloudflare and others), adding 967 KiB and 896 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 720 ms

    720 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 720 ms of main-thread work and 707 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,102 HTML elements

    The page has 2,102 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 198 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 28.7 s

    28.7 s

    Your largest element takes 28.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Medical professional and patient smiling and holding hands”.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.5 s

    30.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 489 ms

    489 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 489 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 195 ms to 212 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 722 ms

    722 ms

    Real visitors wait 722 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.046

    0.046

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.046, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix36
  • Page weight: 9.5 MB in 58 requests

    9.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.5 MB in 58 requests on a phone: images 8.2 MB (18), scripts 1.0 MB (16) and stylesheets 190 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    how-rlt-works-animated-gif.gif weighs 7.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    hcp-and-patient-smiling-in-medical-office-v2.jpg.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    72 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example ivan-fagioli-robot-crop.jpg at 1,280 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 72 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (350 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.70 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.70 g of CO₂e: 323.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9596
  • 8 tap targets too small

    8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • Meta description is long (182 characters)

    Your meta description is 182 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 321 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 321 pages on adacap.com and 13 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Radioligand Therapy”.

  • Title: 30 characters

    Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “Radioligand Therapy | Novartis”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.novartis.com/research-and-development/technology-platforms/radioligand-therapy.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.novartis.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,606 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages share a title

    /ca-en and /ca-fr all use the title “Novartis Canada”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages share a meta description

    /ar-es, /br-pt, /ca-fr, /acc-es, /mx-es and /au-en and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 200 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 9 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://adacap.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (novartis.com).

  • Valid certificate (66 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for adacap.com and is valid for another 66 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://adacap.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 49 links work

    All 49 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 9 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    novartis.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    novartis.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 30 years old

    30 years

    novartis.com was registered in Apr 1996 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Nov 2028

    novartis.com is registered until Nov 2028.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 747 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 747 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

3 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Apply”, “Value-based pricing” and “Publications order form”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 mx a ip4:50.201.69.200 ip4:94.228.179.40/29 ip4:81.28.196.0/24 ip4:205.220.185.193 ip4:143.55.144.141 include:sp…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Hiring

Hiring
8 open roles
Job board
careers page

Company

Founded
2002
Headquarters
Saint-Genis-Pouilly

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on adacap.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25