Website review, no card needed

adweek.com logo

adweek.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202660 issues · 122 checks

This review found 60 issues worth fixing on adweek.com, 22 of them high impact, across 122 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s2.2 sApr 25Oct 102.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.8 s
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
222 ms183 msApr 25Oct 10188 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026204 ms
May 2, 2026200 ms
May 9, 2026202 ms
May 16, 2026206 ms
May 23, 2026205 ms
May 30, 2026207 ms
Jun 6, 2026210 ms
Jun 13, 2026208 ms
Jun 20, 2026212 ms
Jun 27, 2026217 ms
Jul 4, 2026216 ms
Jul 11, 2026202 ms
Jul 18, 2026199 ms
Jul 25, 2026195 ms
Aug 1, 2026192 ms
Aug 8, 2026207 ms
Aug 15, 2026210 ms
Aug 22, 2026204 ms
Aug 29, 2026202 ms
Sep 5, 2026196 ms
Sep 12, 2026193 ms
Sep 19, 2026192 ms
Sep 26, 2026187 ms
Oct 3, 2026187 ms
Oct 10, 2026188 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

14 to fix11
  • Improve image delivery

    8.7 s · 2.3 MB

    14 images could be 2.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.7 s

    37 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.7 s.

  • Main-thread work: 14.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 14.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Sentry adds 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Sentry costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 36 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 11

    11/100

    Your mobile performance score is 11 (desktop: 42). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Sentry, Google Tag Manager and Pubmatic and others), adding 2.7 MB and 2.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    770 ms · 1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 770 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    944 KiB

    156 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (944 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 371 ms

    371 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 371 ms of main-thread work and 556 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 255 ms

    255 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 255 ms of main-thread work and 725 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Pubmatic adds 285 ms

    285 ms

    Pubmatic costs a phone 285 ms of main-thread work and 71 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 216 ms

    216 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 216 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 271 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1,880 HTML elements

    The page has 1,880 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    85 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 85 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    21 KiB

    About 21 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 42 but mobile only 11. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.4 s

    20.4 s

    Your largest element takes 20.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Ads of the Week: 13 Campaigns That Caught Our Eye, From Chi…”.

  • Speed Index: 17.6 s

    17.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 62.1 s

    62.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 62.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.655

    0.655

    The layout shifts by 0.655 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 980 ms

    980 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 980 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 204 ms to 188 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 192 ms

    192 ms

    Real visitors wait 192 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix29
  • Page weight: 8.8 MB in 1,153 requests

    8.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.8 MB in 1,153 requests on a phone: scripts 3.9 MB (147), images 3.3 MB (352) and other files 864 KiB (498). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    AdsofWeekOct16.png weighs 1,020 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    1.2 MB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example AdsofWeekOct16.png at 1,200 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 1.2 MB.

  • 11 images below the first screen load straight away

    11 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    AdsofWeekOct16.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.48 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.48 g of CO₂e: 297.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 8287
  • 7 buttons without a name

    7 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (15 elements)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9278
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (6 characters)

    Your title is only 6 characters: “ADWEEK”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is short (50 characters)

    Your meta description is only 50 characters: “Breaking News in Advertising, Media and Technology”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 133 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 133 pages on adweek.com and 16 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.adweek.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: NewsArticle, NewsMediaOrganization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.adweek.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,201 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /contributor/mitchell-parton and /contributor/mark-stenberg use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 6 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /vertical/agencies, whose canonical is /agencies. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    /vertical/agencies, /vertical/brand-marketing, /vertical/creativity, /vertical/media, /vertical/convergent-tv and /vertical/commerce have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /subscription has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 3169
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://ams-pageview-public.s3.amazonaws.com/1x1-pixel.png?id=16fbc9821a86.

  • 29 third-party cookies

    29 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Attribution Reporting is deprecated and will be removed. See https://goo.gle/ps-status for details.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “wp is not defined”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

  • Requests the notification permission on page load

    Requests the notification permission on page load.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (adweek.com).

  • Valid certificate (80 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for adweek.com and is valid for another 80 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://adweek.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 56 links work

    All 56 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 16 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    adweek.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    adweek.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 31 years old

    31 years

    adweek.com was registered in May 1995 through Moniker Online Services LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2027

    adweek.com is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

5 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,152 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,152 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “Register here.” and “SIGN UP FOR FREE Loading...”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be adweek.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a mx ip4:63.247.178.131 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mxsmtp.sendpulse.com include:_spf.salesforce.…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 27 cookies set on arrival

    27

    Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 89 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 89 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • 1 plugin is behind its latest release.svg-support 2.5.9 → 2.6.1
  • It loads jQuery 3.4.1, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.3
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1978

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 60 issues on adweek.com, including 25 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25