Website review, no card needed

afrointroductions.com logo

afrointroductions.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202641 issues · 99 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on afrointroductions.com, 15 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.4 s3.9 sApr 18Oct 34.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20264.5 s
Apr 25, 20264.9 s
May 2, 20265.1 s
May 9, 20265.3 s
May 16, 20265.2 s
May 23, 20265.0 s
May 30, 20265.0 s
Jun 6, 20264.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.7 s
Jun 20, 20264.7 s
Jun 27, 20264.6 s
Jul 4, 20264.7 s
Jul 11, 20264.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.7 s
Jul 25, 20264.6 s
Aug 1, 20264.5 s
Aug 8, 20264.5 s
Aug 15, 20264.4 s
Aug 22, 20264.4 s
Aug 29, 20264.4 s
Sep 5, 20264.4 s
Sep 12, 20264.4 s
Sep 19, 20264.3 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
228 ms170 msApr 18Oct 3177 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026201 ms
Apr 25, 2026195 ms
May 2, 2026193 ms
May 9, 2026194 ms
May 16, 2026198 ms
May 23, 2026202 ms
May 30, 2026202 ms
Jun 6, 2026203 ms
Jun 13, 2026203 ms
Jun 20, 2026204 ms
Jun 27, 2026206 ms
Jul 4, 2026207 ms
Jul 11, 2026206 ms
Jul 18, 2026205 ms
Jul 25, 2026204 ms
Aug 1, 2026204 ms
Aug 8, 2026210 ms
Aug 15, 2026216 ms
Aug 22, 2026221 ms
Aug 29, 2026217 ms
Sep 5, 2026207 ms
Sep 12, 2026195 ms
Sep 19, 2026183 ms
Sep 26, 2026178 ms
Oct 3, 2026177 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of afrointroductions.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. afrointroductions.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. afrointroductions.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. afrointroductions.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. afrointroductions.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. afrointroductions.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. afrointroductions.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. afrointroductions.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. afrointroductions.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

afrointroductions.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix38
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.0 s · 691 KiB

    About 691 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 489 KiB

    28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (489 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.1 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    850 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 538 ms

    538 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 538 ms of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 48 KiB

    2 images could be 48 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 280 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 257 ms

    257 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 257 ms of main-thread work and 158 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 38 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    54 KiB

    About 54 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 15 ms

    15 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Real visitors wait 4.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.7 s

    15.7 s

    Your largest element takes 15.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Meet African Singles Join with Email”.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.1 s

    18.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 853 ms

    853 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 853 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 313 ms

    313 ms

    Real visitors wait 313 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 201 ms to 177 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 85 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 85 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (36), other files 151 KiB (32) and images 112 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (20 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.61 g of CO₂e: 73.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8891
  • Form elements should have a visible label (4 elements)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 4 images without alt text

    4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9292
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 71 internal links, 40 external

    The homepage links to 71 pages on afrointroductions.com and 40 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “Meet African singles on AfroIntroductions, the most trusted African dating site with over 4.5 million members. Join now…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Meet African Singles”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “African Dating & Singles at AfroIntroductions.com™”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.afrointroductions.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.afrointroductions.com/index-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (568 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5465
  • No mobile viewport

    No viewport meta tag, so phones render the desktop layout zoomed out.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    12 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://afrointroductions.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 0 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (afrointroductions.com).

  • Valid certificate (180 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for afrointroductions.com and is valid for another 180 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 60 links work

    All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    afrointroductions.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    afrointroductions.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 24 years old

    24 years

    afrointroductions.com was registered in Feb 2002 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Feb 2027

    afrointroductions.com is registered until Feb 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • A 9-field form

    Your longest form asks for 9 fields (5 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 863 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 863 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join with Email” and “Join Now”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “join free today” and “Contact Us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

1 to fix45
  • No DMARC policy

    afrointroductions.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • Email authentication score: 45/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:zohomail.com.au ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 21 cookies set on arrival

    21

    Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 41 issues on afrointroductions.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25