Website review, no card needed
alfreddunner.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202642 issues · 87 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on alfreddunner.com, 17 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72C- #84,854 of 108,857 reviewed websitesbeats 19%
- #52,558 of 61,765 online storesbeats 12%
- #528 of 732 BigCommerce storesbeats 23%
Closest competitors among BigCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 158 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 198 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.7 s
2.6 s
3.5 s
4.4 s
5.2 s
6.1 s
7.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.3 s · 5.5 MB23 images could be 5.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.8 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.4 s · 982 KiB36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (982 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 57). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Bigcommerce and getredo.com and others), adding 8.1 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 96 KiBAbout 96 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
bc0a.com adds 99 ms
99 msbc0a.com costs a phone 99 ms of main-thread work and 5.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 477 ms
477 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 477 ms of main-thread work and 968 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
450 ms · 71 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 71 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Duplicated JavaScript
350 ms · 25 KiB25 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Bigcommerce adds 247 ms
247 msBigcommerce costs a phone 247 ms of main-thread work and 540 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
getredo.com adds 196 ms
196 msgetredo.com costs a phone 196 ms of main-thread work and 456 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,524 HTML elements
The page has 1,524 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 158 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
21 KiB21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.9 s
23.9 sYour largest element takes 23.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Smiling woman in a floral sweater holding a drink, seated o…”.
Time to Interactive: 32.3 s
32.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.1 s
6.1 sThe first text or image appears after 6.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.0 s
12.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.18
0.18For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 148 ms to 198 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.197
0.197The layout shifts by 0.197 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 440 ms
440 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 440 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 115 ms
115 msReal visitors wait 115 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 634 ms
634 msReal visitors wait 634 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.8 MB in 291 requests
9.8 MBYour homepage downloads 9.8 MB in 291 requests on a phone: images 5.9 MB (29), scripts 3.2 MB (158) and other files 375 KiB (86). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
17 images far larger than shown
4.8 MB17 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 56241_source_1784751943.jpg at 2,000 px wide, shown at 93 px. Resized copies would save about 4.8 MB.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit
2.76 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.76 g of CO₂e: 331.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 33 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 H1 headlines
There are 9 <h1> headlines (“Women's Style at Every Age | Alfred Dunner”, “Into Fall” and “Into Fall”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://alfreddunner.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
116 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 116 pages on alfreddunner.com and 4 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Women's Style at Every Age | Alfred Dunner”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://alfreddunner.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList and Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://alfreddunner.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (327 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://alfreddunner.com/contact-us, https://alfreddunner.com/dinner-theater and https://alfreddunner.com/regent-street have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 54 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=151011784&Ver=2&mid=595bb364-f459-4c30-a31a-50cabf8494bc&bo=1&sid=ae54c500cb5911f18cee7b22c05aeb93&vid=ae54e0e0cb5911f189ac95e1190c15fc&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught ReferenceError: SHGJQ is not defined”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
32 of 33 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 270 words of copy
The homepage carries about 270 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP NEW ARRIVALS” and “Shop Women's Tonal Applique Half-Zip Top”.
18 calls to action
The homepage has 18 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Shop All Clothing” and “Shop All Plus”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
29 cookies set on arrival
29Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
47 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 47 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at alfreddunner.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- BigCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on alfreddunner.com, including 25 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.