Website review, no card needed
allot.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202631 issues · 95 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on allot.com, 9 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 137 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
allot.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
4.4 s · 2.2 MB4 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 68
68/100Your mobile performance score is 68. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and userway.org and others), adding 1.1 MB and 599 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
20 ms · 408 KiBAbout 408 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 20 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 362 ms
362 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 362 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
390 KiB27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (390 KiB).
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 932 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Hubspot adds 157 ms
157 msHubspot costs a phone 157 ms of main-thread work and 343 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 139 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Reduce unused CSS
13 KiBAbout 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.30
0.30For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.30 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.7 s
6.7 sYour largest element takes 6.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Family using connected devices at home, protected by their …”.
Time to Interactive: 11.4 s
11.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 3.7 s
3.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 227 ms
227 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 227 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
12 images without width and height
12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 111 ms
111 msReal visitors wait 111 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 674 ms
674 msReal visitors wait 674 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.049
0.049The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.049, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 2.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
831 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example slide-unprotected.png at 1,460 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 831 KiB.
Page weight: 3.9 MB in 109 requests
3.9 MBYour homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 109 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (30), scripts 1.1 MB (49) and fonts 69 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
slide-visibility.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
5 images in older formats
5 images (320 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.10 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.10 g of CO₂e: 131.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
17 text elements with low contrast
17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
12 links without text
12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 39 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
128 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 128 pages on allot.com and 9 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 126 characters
Your meta description is 126 characters: “Allot is a global provider of innovative cybersecurity solutions & network intelligence for Service Providers and Enter…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Allot — Protecting The Unprotected”.
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Allot - Cybersecurity Solutions & Network Intelligence”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.allot.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.allot.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (968 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (58 KiB, 364 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
12 small tap targets
12 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
http:// does not redirect
http://allot.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://customers.allot.com/.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (allot.com).
Valid certificate (49 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for allot.com and is valid for another 49 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 47 links work
All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
allot.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
allot.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 29 years old
29 yearsallot.com was registered in Jun 1997 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jun 2029
allot.com is registered until Jun 2029.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 460 words of copy
The homepage carries about 460 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Talk to an expert”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 33 testimonial or review blocks, 14 customer or partner logos and 14 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 mx ip4:199.203.223.0/24 ip4:5.9.0.0/16 ip4:195.235.197.170 ip4:18.203.227.33 include:spf.protection.outlook.com …”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1996
- Headquarters
- Hod HaSharon
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on allot.com, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.