Website review, no card needed
alu.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202632 issues · 76 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on alu.com, 10 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 395 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 387 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 382 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 358 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 452 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 507 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 415 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 415 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 383 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 378 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 321 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 359 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 360 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 437 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 393 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 491 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 420 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 420 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
900 ms · 6.3 MB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.3 MB).
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 2.9 MB7 images could be 2.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
900 ms · 236 KiBAbout 236 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 73
73/100Your mobile performance score is 73 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
850 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 850 ms.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (iubenda and Google Tag Manager), adding 274 KiB and 169 ms of main-thread time.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 68 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
15 KiBAbout 15 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.8 s
A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 339 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.9 s
6.9 sYour largest element takes 6.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Image”.
Real-user INP: 275 ms
275 msReal visitors wait 275 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 6.9 s
6.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 6.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.0 s
5.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 395 ms to 420 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 24 ms
24 msScripts block the page for only 24 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.6 MB in 21 requests
6.6 MBYour homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 21 requests on a phone: images 3.3 MB (7), media 2.8 MB (2) and scripts 427 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 2.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
716 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example CAIA_Flagship_038_HRes_new_1920x1600.avif at 3,396 px wide, shown at 337 px. Resized copies would save about 716 KiB.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Homepage-1.avif is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.87 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.87 g of CO₂e: 224.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (2 elements)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (21 characters)
Your title is only 21 characters: “Retail displays - ALU”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
82 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 82 pages on alu.com and 4 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 148 characters
Your meta description is 148 characters: “Modular retail solutions since 1990, ALU designs and produces flexible display systems for stores, pop-ups, and showroo…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “We create modular systems, customizable systems and purely bespoke solutions.”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://alu.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.alu.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (502 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.alu.com/contacts has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.alu.com/projects has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.alu.com/systems/plot, https://www.alu.com/systems/tondoquadro and https://www.alu.com/systems/insula took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
18 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 512 words of copy
The homepage carries about 512 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact us” and “Subscribe”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: iubenda
A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at alu.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Hiring
- Hiring
- 26 open roles
- Teams
- ALU RW (6), ALCHE (3), Enrollment (3), Performance & Governance (3)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- www.alu.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on alu.com, including 13 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.