Website review, no card needed
alumetal.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202648 issues · 112 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on alumetal.com.br, 21 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70C- #66,897 of 80,731 reviewed websitesbeats 15%
- #35,589 of 39,747 online storesbeats 8%
- #22 of 31 OpenCart storesbeats 30%
Closest competitors among OpenCart stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 269 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 196 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 394 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 394 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 324 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
7.7 s · 6.2 MB94 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.2 MB).
Render-blocking requests
6.3 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.3 s.
Improve image delivery
1.2 s · 3.9 MB38 images could be 3.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.8 s · 641 KiBAbout 641 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
3.0 s · 579 KiBAbout 579 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.2 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.2 s).
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47 (desktop: 63). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.2 MB and 918 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 694 ms
694 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 694 ms of main-thread work and 751 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 17 KiB17 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 976 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 41 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 224 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Document request latency
61 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 148 ms
148 msYour server sent the HTML in 148 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.2 s
23.2 sYour largest element takes 23.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Damper / Janela Corta-Fogo Sob Medida”.
Speed Index: 15.9 s
15.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 27.7 s
27.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.1 s
7.1 sThe first text or image appears after 7.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 39% slower for real visitors
+39%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 269 ms to 324 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
79 images without width and height
79 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 363 ms
363 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 363 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.3 MB in 122 requests
7.3 MBYour homepage downloads 7.3 MB in 122 requests on a phone: images 4.9 MB (75), scripts 1.4 MB (16) and stylesheets 649 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
21 images far larger than shown
919 KiB21 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example ferregista-20cm-300dpi-slide-1140x380.png at 1,140 px wide, shown at 332 px. Resized copies would save about 919 KiB.
34 images in older formats
34 images (4.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
16 images below the first screen load straight away
16 images further down the page (725 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.07 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.07 g of CO₂e: 248.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
71 buttons without a name
71 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
17 tap targets too small
17 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (59 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 59 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
31 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 11 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Structured data has 6 problems
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, Store and WebSite) but with 6 problems, for example “WebSite: url is not an absolute URL ("www.alumetal.com.br")”.
206 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 206 pages on alumetal.com.br and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Etiquetas de Patrimônio - Placas de Identificação - Placas de Inauguração - Placas de Homenagem - Etiquetas de móveis –…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Alumetal Placas de Identificação”.
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Placas de Identificação em alumínio ou aço inox”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://alumetal.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (863 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages share a meta description
/sobre-nos.html, /localizacao.html, /corte-a-laser.html and /contato.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
/corte-a-laser.html has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
/comprar/etiquetas-de-moveis.html, /comprar/etiquetas-de-extintor.html and /comprar/reguas-para-brindes.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 113 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Mixed Content: The page at 'https://alumetal.com.br/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure stylesheet 'http…”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
45 of 55 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://alumetal.com.br/comprar/escorredor-de-pratos.html (404).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://www.facebook.com/AlumetalOficial.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
3 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (alumetal.com.br).
Valid certificate (43 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for alumetal.com.br and is valid for another 43 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://alumetal.com.br redirects to the secure version.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
alumetal.com.br has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
3 checks passed
Domain is 27 years old
27 yearsalumetal.com.br was registered in Jan 1999. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
DNSSEC is on
alumetal.com.br's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Registered until Jan 2027
alumetal.com.br is registered until Jan 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 597 words of copy
The homepage carries about 597 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be alumetal.com.br is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- Joomla! - Open Source Content Management
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on alumetal.com.br, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.