Website review, no card needed
amazonmgmstudios.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202662 issues · 116 checks
This review found 62 issues worth fixing on amazonmgmstudios.com, 24 of them high impact, across 116 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
57FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 164 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 163 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 139 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
27.6 s · 14.7 MB82 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14.7 MB).
Improve image delivery
24.0 s · 12.8 MB78 images could be 12.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 24.0 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 455 KiBAbout 455 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 40). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and contentfabric.io and others), adding 7.7 MB and 226 ms of main-thread time.
contentfabric.io adds 0 ms
0 mscontentfabric.io costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 7.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
350 ms · 42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 328 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 208 ms
208 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 208 ms of main-thread work and 362 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 111 KiBAbout 111 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.71
0.71For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.71 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 36.6 s
36.6 sYour largest element takes 36.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Featured Franchises James Bond Franchise Rocky Franchise Pi…”.
Time to Interactive: 41.5 s
41.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 41.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.2 s
11.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.318
0.318The layout shifts by 0.318 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
45 images without width and height
45 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 408 ms
408 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 408 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 128 ms
128 msReal visitors wait 128 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 793 ms
793 msReal visitors wait 793 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 164 ms to 139 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 16.9 MB in 140 requests
16.9 MBYour homepage downloads 16.9 MB in 140 requests on a phone: images 15.4 MB (87), scripts 1.2 MB (7) and fonts 205 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 1.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
10 images far larger than shown
1.9 MB10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example MGM_Bek_2_TrailerLaunch_Static_TT_640x300_Color.png at 1,280 px wide, shown at 192 px. Resized copies would save about 1.9 MB.
38 images in older formats
38 images (7.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (972 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.8 g of CO₂ per visit
4.80 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.80 g of CO₂e: 576.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
23 tap targets too small
23 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (91 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 91 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
24 links without text
24 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 4 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (11 characters)
Your title is only 11 characters: “MGM Studios”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
40 links crawlers can't follow
40 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
7 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 7 pages on amazonmgmstudios.com and 10 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) is a leading entertainment company focused on the production and global distribution of film …”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mgm.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mgm.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
10%A phone browser shows 267 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 26. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
4 pages point its canonical at the homepage
/news, /corporate/licensing, /privacy-policy and /terms-of-use declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
5 pages share a title
/, /news, /corporate/licensing, /privacy-policy and /terms-of-use all use the title “MGM Studios”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages share a meta description
/news, /corporate/licensing, /privacy-policy and /terms-of-use use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
/news, /corporate/licensing, /privacy-policy and /terms-of-use have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages with very little text
/news, /corporate/licensing, /privacy-policy and /terms-of-use have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
4 internal pages checked
We fetched 4 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 4 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 4 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
38 small tap targets
38 of 51 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
7 distorted images
7 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
13 low-resolution images
13 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
http:// does not redirect
http://amazonmgmstudios.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (mgm.com).
Valid certificate (111 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for amazonmgmstudios.com and is valid for another 111 days.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 10 links work
All 10 links checked from your homepage (5 internal, 5 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 78 days
mgm.com is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.
No CAA record
mgm.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
mgm.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
1 checks passed
Domain is 29 years old
29 yearsmgm.com was registered in Jan 1997 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 267 words of copy
The homepage carries about 267 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
amazonmgmstudios.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
No SPF record
amazonmgmstudios.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Domain receives no email
amazonmgmstudios.com has no MX record, so it receives no email. SPF -all and DMARC reject still matter: they stop others sending mail as you.
Email authentication score: 0/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 62 issues on amazonmgmstudios.com, including 20 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.