Website review, no card needed

amgen.com logo

amgen.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202636 issues · 104 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on amgen.com, 15 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.6 s4.8 sMay 2Oct 175.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20265.0 s
May 9, 20265.1 s
May 16, 20265.1 s
May 23, 20265.1 s
May 30, 20265.1 s
Jun 6, 20265.2 s
Jun 13, 20265.2 s
Jun 20, 20265.3 s
Jun 27, 20265.3 s
Jul 4, 20265.2 s
Jul 11, 20265.3 s
Jul 18, 20265.2 s
Jul 25, 20265.2 s
Aug 1, 20265.3 s
Aug 8, 20265.3 s
Aug 15, 20265.4 s
Aug 22, 20265.5 s
Aug 29, 20265.5 s
Sep 5, 20265.4 s
Sep 12, 20265.0 s
Sep 19, 20264.9 s
Sep 26, 20265.0 s
Oct 3, 20265.1 s
Oct 10, 20265.3 s
Oct 17, 20265.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
133 ms116 msMay 2Oct 17124 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026120 ms
May 9, 2026122 ms
May 16, 2026121 ms
May 23, 2026120 ms
May 30, 2026121 ms
Jun 6, 2026121 ms
Jun 13, 2026124 ms
Jun 20, 2026126 ms
Jun 27, 2026126 ms
Jul 4, 2026128 ms
Jul 11, 2026128 ms
Jul 18, 2026128 ms
Jul 25, 2026129 ms
Aug 1, 2026129 ms
Aug 8, 2026130 ms
Aug 15, 2026131 ms
Aug 22, 2026131 ms
Aug 29, 2026129 ms
Sep 5, 2026127 ms
Sep 12, 2026121 ms
Sep 19, 2026119 ms
Sep 26, 2026118 ms
Oct 3, 2026118 ms
Oct 10, 2026120 ms
Oct 17, 2026124 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of amgen.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. amgen.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. amgen.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. amgen.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. amgen.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  5. amgen.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  6. amgen.com at 6.7 s6.7 s
  7. amgen.com at 7.9 s7.9 s
  8. amgen.com at 9.0 s9.0 s

amgen.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix31
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.3 s

    32 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 245 KiB

    About 245 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 150 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (150 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 31

    31/100

    Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 40). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    770 ms · 121 KiB

    About 121 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 770 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 1.1 MB and 490 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 377 ms

    377 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 377 ms of main-thread work and 345 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 801 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Adobe TypeKit adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Adobe TypeKit costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 502 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    1 image could be 25 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 174 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    33 KiB

    33 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    31 KiB

    31 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    15 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 15 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    Real visitors wait 6.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.0 s

    12.0 s

    Your largest element takes 12.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “$name”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.954

    0.954

    The layout shifts by 0.954 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.1 s

    12.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.15

    0.15

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 18 images without width and height

    18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 124 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.0 s to 5.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 134 ms

    134 ms

    Real visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 87 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.50 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.50 g of CO₂e: 60.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.8 MB in 127 requests

    1.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 127 requests on a phone: scripts 699 KiB (33), fonts 549 KiB (14) and images 257 KiB (34). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9195
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (25 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 25 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 76 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8587
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (278 characters)

    Your meta description is 278 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 13 links crawlers can't follow

    13 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 251 internal links, 29 external

    The homepage links to 251 pages on amgen.com and 29 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Amgen | A Worldwide Pioneer in Biotechnology”.

  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Amgen | A Worldwide Pioneer in Biotechnology”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.amgen.com/about.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.amgen.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (850 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 8 pages without a meta description

    /about/amgen-history, /about/mission-and-values, /about/leadership, /about/awards-and-accolades, /about/how-we-operate and /about/how-we-operate/corporate-governance and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /responsibility/a-healthy-amgen/business-ethics-and-compliance has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 95 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 36 small tap targets

    36 of 57 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 low-resolution images

    6 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example http://www.twitter.com/amgen (520).

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://careers.amgen.com/.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (amgen.com).

  • Valid certificate (85 days left)

    The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA OV R36 verifies for amgen.com and is valid for another 85 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://amgen.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    amgen.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    amgen.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 36 years old

    36 years

    amgen.com was registered in Jul 1990 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jul 2027

    amgen.com is registered until Jul 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 420 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 420 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Start-Up Network Program”, “Learn more” and “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 36 issues on amgen.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25