Website review, no card needed

ampp.org logo

ampp.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202649 issues · 111 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on ampp.org, 21 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.0 s2.8 sMay 9Oct 243.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.4 s
Jun 27, 20263.8 s
Jul 4, 20263.8 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.6 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.7 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
371 ms222 msMay 9Oct 24349 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026255 ms
May 16, 2026274 ms
May 23, 2026272 ms
May 30, 2026269 ms
Jun 6, 2026259 ms
Jun 13, 2026249 ms
Jun 20, 2026239 ms
Jun 27, 2026260 ms
Jul 4, 2026281 ms
Jul 11, 2026278 ms
Jul 18, 2026265 ms
Jul 25, 2026262 ms
Aug 1, 2026239 ms
Aug 8, 2026256 ms
Aug 15, 2026280 ms
Aug 22, 2026282 ms
Aug 29, 2026297 ms
Sep 5, 2026296 ms
Sep 12, 2026308 ms
Sep 19, 2026328 ms
Sep 26, 2026334 ms
Oct 3, 2026354 ms
Oct 10, 2026351 ms
Oct 17, 2026342 ms
Oct 24, 2026349 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

12 to fix25
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6.1 s · 1.8 MB

    76 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    7.7 s

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 7.7 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.1 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 25

    25/100

    Your mobile performance score is 25 (desktop: 38). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cloudfront.net and Facebook and others), adding 3.2 MB and 2.9 s of main-thread time.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.3 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    900 ms · 220 KiB

    8 images could be 220 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    900 ms · 192 KiB

    About 192 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • cloudfront.net adds 526 ms

    526 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 526 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 353 ms

    353 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 353 ms of main-thread work and 226 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 42 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    100 ms · 17 KiB

    17 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 34 ms

    34 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 869 ms

    869 ms

    Real visitors wait 869 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.3 s

    14.3 s

    Your largest element takes 14.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Ready. Set. SAVE! Advance registration is open!”. Most of its time is resource load delay (7.9 s).

  • Speed Index: 19.8 s

    19.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 19.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.6 s

    30.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 31% slower for real visitors

    +31%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 255 ms to 349 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.035

    0.035

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.035, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix63
  • Page weight: 4.0 MB in 193 requests

    4.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 193 requests on a phone: scripts 2.6 MB (78), images 564 KiB (32) and fonts 503 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (401 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (358 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.15 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.15 g of CO₂e: 137.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8691
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 45 text elements with low contrast

    45 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    3 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 14 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9279
  • Title is long (70 characters)

    Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “AMPP - The Association for Materials Protection and Performance - AMPP”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://ampp.org/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 200 internal links, 26 external

    The homepage links to 200 pages on ampp.org and 26 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “AMPP, the worldwide network of experts committed to advancing corrosion control and protective coatings, ensuring the h…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “AMPP - The Association for Materials Protection and Performance”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,086 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    /education and /education/certification-information all use the title “Education & Certification - AMPP”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    /education/certification-information/cert-resources-link, /education/services-available and /education/services-available/credentials-link have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /education and /education/certification-information use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    /education/certification-information, /education/certification-information/epg-link and /education/certification-information/cert-resources-link took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 163 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    10 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5474
  • 4 broken images

    4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://ampp.org/home.

  • 4 third-party cookies

    4 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_BLOCKED_BY_RESPONSE.NotSameOrigin”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • 10 links through redirect chains

    10 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://ampp.org/HigherLogic/Security/OAUTH/SignIn.aspx?ReturnUrl=https%3a%2f%2fampp.org%2fhome.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ampp.org).

  • Valid certificate (55 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for ampp.org and is valid for another 55 days.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ampp.org redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 60 links work

    All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 10 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    ampp.org has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    ampp.org's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 12 years old

    12 years

    ampp.org was registered in Apr 2014 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Apr 2028

    ampp.org is registered until Apr 2028.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 834 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 834 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT US”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Course Schedule” and “Shop Guides & Comparators”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.cadmiumcd.com include:spf.client.mirabeltechnologies.com include:…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “k2”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 49 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 49 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Company

Employees
127

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on ampp.org, including 24 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25