Website review, no card needed

appier.com logo

appier.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202639 issues · 103 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on appier.com, 14 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: 4 images over 500 KB. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.1 s1.9 sMay 2Oct 173.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.3 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.6 s
Aug 22, 20264.2 s
Aug 29, 20264.5 s
Sep 5, 20264.7 s
Sep 12, 20264.6 s
Sep 19, 20264.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
313 ms118 msMay 2Oct 17229 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026140 ms
May 9, 2026142 ms
May 16, 2026148 ms
May 23, 2026155 ms
May 30, 2026155 ms
Jun 6, 2026158 ms
Jun 13, 2026153 ms
Jun 20, 2026150 ms
Jun 27, 2026156 ms
Jul 4, 2026152 ms
Jul 11, 2026146 ms
Jul 18, 2026148 ms
Jul 25, 2026146 ms
Aug 1, 2026152 ms
Aug 8, 2026174 ms
Aug 15, 2026217 ms
Aug 22, 2026239 ms
Aug 29, 2026268 ms
Sep 5, 2026284 ms
Sep 12, 2026290 ms
Sep 19, 2026243 ms
Sep 26, 2026221 ms
Oct 3, 2026204 ms
Oct 10, 2026178 ms
Oct 17, 2026229 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of appier.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. appier.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. appier.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. appier.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. appier.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. appier.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. appier.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. appier.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. appier.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

appier.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

4 to fix59
  • Improve image delivery

    11.7 MB

    11 images could be 11.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    800 ms · 1.6 MB

    103 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.6 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 89). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    550 ms

    18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Hubspot, Unpkg and hubspotusercontent-na2.net and others), adding 352 KiB and 108 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 54 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    10 ms · 11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10 ms faster on a phone.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 89 but mobile only 59. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 331 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Real visitors wait 6.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 37.2 s

    37.2 s

    Your largest element takes 37.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI”.

  • Time to Interactive: 40.3 s

    40.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 40.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.1 s

    12.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 466 ms

    466 ms

    Real visitors wait 466 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 44% slower for real visitors

    +44%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 140 ms to 229 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 39% slower for real visitors

    +39%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 4 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 84.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    68.6 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example AI brain_EN_0909.gif at 2,400 px wide, shown at 330 px. Resized copies would save about 68.6 MB.

  • Page weight: 15.6 MB in 129 requests

    15.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 15.6 MB in 129 requests on a phone: images 12.1 MB (71), media 3.1 MB (2) and scripts 354 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images below the first screen load straight away

    8 images further down the page (85.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (84.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 4.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.43 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.43 g of CO₂e: 531.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8589
  • 13 tap targets too small

    13 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8593
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI” and “Built with Agentic DNA from Day One.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 28 links with vague text

    28 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 167 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 167 pages on appier.com and 12 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 106 characters

    Your meta description is 106 characters: “Comprehensive AI-Powered Solutions: Smoother Operations. Elevated Customer Experience. Better Performance.”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.appier.com/en/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Corporation.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.appier.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,406 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 2 pages share a title

    /en and / all use the title “Appier | Empowering Businesses to Turn AI into ROI”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    /en/contact and /en/products/botbonnie have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is /en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /en/contact has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 75 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6983
  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://appier.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • 3 links through redirect chains

    3 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.appier.com/?hsLang=en.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

9 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (appier.com).

  • Valid certificate (67 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for appier.com and is valid for another 67 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://appier.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 50 links work

    All 50 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 10 external) answered without errors.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

4 checks passed
  • Domain is 24 years old

    24 years

    appier.com was registered in Aug 2002 through Spaceship, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only entrust.net, amazon.com, comodoca.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for appier.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • DNSSEC is on

    appier.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Aug 2027

    appier.com is registered until Aug 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 638 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 638 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.

  • 30 calls to action

    The homepage has 30 calls to action, for example “Book a Demo”, “Contact IR” and “Contact Us”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 18 customer or partner logos and 9 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io include:9…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
HubSpot
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Hiring

Hiring
66 open roles
Teams
Engineering (14), Scientist (12), Internship & Part-time (6), Account Management (5)
Job board
greenhouse

Company

Founded
2012
Headquarters
Taipei

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on appier.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25