Website review, no card needed
apsis.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202655 issues · 107 checks
This review found 55 issues worth fixing on apsis.com.br, 23 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 151 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 160 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 231 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
4.4 s · 1.0 MB5 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.4 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.4 s40 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.2 s · 358 KiB18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (358 KiB).
YouTube adds 1.1 s
1.1 sYouTube costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.6 s
A phone's processor spends 6.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 3.2 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 561 ms
561 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 561 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 208 KiBAbout 208 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 23 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 257 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
poli.digital adds 144 ms
144 mspoli.digital costs a phone 144 ms of main-thread work and 375 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
13 KiB13 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 21.6 s
21.6 sYour largest element takes 21.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “A Apsis é líder por dois anos consecutivos em Valuation pel…”.
Time to Interactive: 36.4 s
36.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 36.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.7 s
14.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.7 s
6.7 sThe first text or image appears after 6.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s
1.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 42% slower for real visitors
+42%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 231 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.1 MB in 219 requests
9.1 MBYour homepage downloads 9.1 MB in 219 requests on a phone: images 5.1 MB (34), scripts 3.2 MB (77) and stylesheets 349 KiB (48). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 2.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images in older formats
6 images (3.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
56 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example webchat.png at 4,501 px wide, shown at 25 px. Resized copies would save about 56 KiB.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.58 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.58 g of CO₂e: 309.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
81 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 81 pages on apsis.com.br and 10 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 76 characters
Your meta description is 76 characters: “A Apsis é líder por dois anos consecutivos em Valuation pela Leaders League,”.
Title: 36 characters
Your title is a healthy 36 characters: “Home - Apsis Consultoria Empresarial”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://apsis.com.br/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and WebPage.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://apsis.com.br/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/cases is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
4 pages share 2 titles
/ and /en all use the title “Home - Apsis Consultoria Empresarial”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
/ativo-fixo and /ativo-fixo-3 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /ativo-fixo-3, whose canonical is /ativo-fixo. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
/en has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (apsis.com.br).
Valid certificate (45 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for apsis.com.br and is valid for another 45 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://apsis.com.br redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 27 links work
All 27 links checked from your homepage (20 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
apsis.com.br has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
apsis.com.br's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 28 years old
28 yearsapsis.com.br was registered in May 1998. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2035
apsis.com.br is registered until May 2035.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 8-field form
Your longest form asks for 8 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 135 words
The homepage has only about 135 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Start search”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be apsis.com.br is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.rdstation.com.br include:sendgrid.net -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
39 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
- It runs WordPress 6.8; the current release is 7.1.3.
- 4 plugins are behind their latest release.fluentform 6.0.3 → 6.2.16 · ajax-search-lite 4.12.7 → 4.14.7 · elementor 3.34.1 → 4.3.5 · molongui-authorship 5.1.0 → 5.3.2
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 6.8
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Company
- Employees
- 230
- Headquarters
- Rio de Janeiro
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 55 issues on apsis.com.br, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.