Website review, no card needed
arcom.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202642 issues · 80 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on arcom.com.br, 14 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 48. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 304 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 304 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 301 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 301 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 301 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 300 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 300 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 299 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 301 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 311 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 48
48/100Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
8.0 MB144 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.0 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.8 MB16 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (clearsale.com.br, Facebook and Hotjar and others), adding 530 KiB and 655 ms of main-thread time.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 388 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
323 KiBAbout 323 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
clearsale.com.br adds 291 ms
291 msclearsale.com.br costs a phone 291 ms of main-thread work and 98 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 273 ms
273 msFacebook costs a phone 273 ms of main-thread work and 259 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
36 KiBAbout 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 24.5 s
24.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 24.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 19.6 s
19.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 928 ms
928 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 928 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.296
0.296The layout shifts by 0.296 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user INP: 313 ms
313 msReal visitors wait 313 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s
2.5 sThe first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
23 images without width and height
23 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 304 ms to 311 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.06
0.06For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 404 ms
404 msReal visitors wait 404 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 45% faster for real visitors
-45%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.5 s
2.5 sYour largest element renders in 2.5 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.3 MB in 170 requests
8.3 MBYour homepage downloads 8.3 MB in 170 requests on a phone: images 6.8 MB (112), scripts 1.3 MB (35) and fonts 115 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.34 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.34 g of CO₂e: 281.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
5 buttons without a name
5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values (1 element).
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 checks passed
15 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 17 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 15 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (9 characters)
Your title is only 9 characters: “Arcom S/A”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.arcom.com.br/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at arcom.com.br/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
2 checks passed
Meta description: 136 characters
Your meta description is 136 characters: “Compre direto pelo atacado! Os melhores produtos estão disponíveis para abastecer a sua loja. Cadastre-se já e aproveit…”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.
9 distorted images
9 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
3 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (arcom.com.br).
Valid certificate (46 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · Thawte TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for arcom.com.br and is valid for another 46 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://arcom.com.br redirects to the secure version.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
arcom.com.br has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
3 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 yearsarcom.com.br was registered in Jun 1996. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
DNSSEC is on
arcom.com.br's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Registered until Jun 2033
arcom.com.br is registered until Jun 2033.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 0 words
The homepage has only about 0 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a mx ip4:200.251.86.128/25 ip4:200.251.93.0/24 ip4:200.251.157.186/32 ip4:200.225.202.96/27 ip4:200.216.188.8/29…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google” and “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Hotjar and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- As16735 Algar Telecom S/A
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on arcom.com.br, including 18 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.