Website review, no card needed
assecobs.pl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202644 issues · 106 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on assecobs.pl, 15 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76C- #51,007 of 84,647 reviewed websitesbeats 35%
- #29,557 of 42,863 online storesbeats 26%
- #898 of 2,128 WooCommerce storesbeats 52%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 142 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 191 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.3 s
1.9 s
2.5 s
3.2 s
3.8 s
4.4 s
5.0 s
assecobs.pl does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Main-thread work: 5.7 s
A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Cookiebot and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
550 ms · 641 KiB20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (641 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 65
65/100Your mobile performance score is 65. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 608 KiBAbout 608 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 493 ms
493 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 493 ms of main-thread work and 536 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 466 ms
466 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 466 ms of main-thread work and 739 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
526 KiB10 images could be 526 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 344 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,476 HTML elements
The page has 2,476 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 86 KiBAbout 86 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 263 ms
263 msYour server sent the HTML in 263 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 16.1 s
16.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.1 s
10.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 727 ms
727 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 727 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 33% slower for real visitors
+33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 142 ms to 191 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 64% slower for real visitors
+64%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sYour largest element takes 3.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.1 s).
10 images without width and height
10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 184 ms
184 msReal visitors wait 184 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.5 MB in 127 requests
7.5 MBYour homepage downloads 7.5 MB in 127 requests on a phone: media 4.3 MB (3), scripts 1.6 MB (46) and images 1.0 MB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images far larger than shown
263 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example agata.webp at 400 px wide, shown at 50 px. Resized copies would save about 263 KiB.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (535 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.13 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.13 g of CO₂e: 255.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (18 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 18 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 53 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 7 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is long (81 characters)
Your title is 81 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Asseco Business Solutions - Twoja przewaga w biznesie - Asseco Business Solutions”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
12 links crawlers can't follow
12 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
119 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 119 pages on assecobs.pl and 19 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Tworzymy oprogramowanie dające przewagę w biznesie”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://assecobs.pl/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://assecobs.pl/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,675 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages without a meta description
/erp, /softlab, /macrologic, /businesscloud, /erp/logistyka-sprzedaz and /erp/finanse-ksiegowosc and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 broken images
4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://assecobs.pl/wp-content/uploads//2025/11/contact-phone.svg.
15 small tap targets
15 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
security.txt has expired
Your security.txt expired on 2025-12-31, so researchers may not trust its contact details.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block, 1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (assecobs.pl).
Valid certificate (127 days left)
The certificate from Asseco Data Systems S.A. · Certum DV TLS G2 R39 CA verifies for assecobs.pl and is valid for another 127 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://assecobs.pl redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 52 links work
All 52 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 12 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
DNSSEC is off
assecobs.pl's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
3 checks passed
Domain is 19 years old
19 yearsassecobs.pl was registered in Mar 2007 through home.pl sp. z o.o.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only sectigo.com, godaddy.com, certum.pl and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for assecobs.pl, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Registered until Mar 2027
assecobs.pl is registered until Mar 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
A 8-field form
Your longest form asks for 8 fields (5 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,198 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,198 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks and 12 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 8 phone links and 9 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.assecobs.pl include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 1 plugin is behind its latest release.contact-form-7-honeypot 3.8.0 → 3.9.0
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Asseco Business Solutions S.A
Company
- Founded
- 2007
- Headquarters
- Lublin
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on assecobs.pl, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.