Website review, no card needed
assignar.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202633 issues · 84 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on assignar.com, 16 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Wistia adds 2.0 s
2.0 sWistia costs a phone 2.0 s of main-thread work and 1,009 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 518 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 28
28/100Your mobile performance score is 28 (desktop: 67). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.7 s
A phone's processor spends 9.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Wistia, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.9 MB and 3.7 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
800 ms · 228 KiB10 images could be 228 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 414 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Facebook adds 303 ms
303 msFacebook costs a phone 303 ms of main-thread work and 223 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
261 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (261 KiB).
2,159 HTML elements
The page has 2,159 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Duplicated JavaScript
40 KiB40 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Reduce unused CSS
37 KiBAbout 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
30 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 67 but mobile only 28. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 105 ms
105 msYour server sent the HTML in 105 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 31.8 s
31.8 sYour largest element takes 31.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Control field operations. Protect your margin.”.
Time to Interactive: 31.9 s
31.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.0 s
3.0 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 10.1 s
10.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sThe first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 29% slower for real visitors
+29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
15 images without width and height
15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.6 MB in 208 requests
7.6 MBYour homepage downloads 7.6 MB in 208 requests on a phone: other files 4.8 MB (93), scripts 1.7 MB (47) and images 787 KiB (51). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images in older formats
3 images (284 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (284 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.15 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.15 g of CO₂e: 257.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Form elements must have labels (1 element)
Form elements must have labels: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
12 text elements with low contrast
12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 42 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
58 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 63 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 58 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
10 links with vague text
10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
6 links crawlers can't follow
6 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
136 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 136 pages on assignar.com and 23 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 127 characters
Your meta description is 127 characters: “Assignar is the best construction software for creating a competitive advantage that will help you win and build more p…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Control field operations. Protect your margin.”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Best Construction Software: Win More & Build More | Assignar”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://assignar.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://assignar.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,253 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://assignar.com/llms.txt (3 KiB, 26 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://assignar.com/lps/progress-tracking is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without an H1
https://assignar.com/integrations has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=134007150&Ver=2&mid=97b699f0-df2e-4076-bb60-e39b3a29ec7a&bo=1&sid=2ffd2840cf5a11f182e45f25a5cdc050&vid=2ffd49d0cf5a11f19250b3299660a71e&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
17 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,459 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,459 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK A DEMO”.
17 calls to action
The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Schedule of Rates [T&M]”, “Book a Demo” and “Get a Demo”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 24 testimonial or review blocks, 5 customer or partner logos, 7 trust badges and “over 800 customers”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
35 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at assignar.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on assignar.com, including 22 speed issues and 2 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.