Website review, no card needed

astronacci.com logo

astronacci.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202664 issues · 121 checks

This review found 64 issues worth fixing on astronacci.com, 20 of them high impact, across 121 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.7 sMay 2Oct 172.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
184 ms140 msMay 2Oct 17168 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026179 ms
May 9, 2026176 ms
May 16, 2026176 ms
May 23, 2026171 ms
May 30, 2026170 ms
Jun 6, 2026171 ms
Jun 13, 2026164 ms
Jun 20, 2026159 ms
Jun 27, 2026156 ms
Jul 4, 2026153 ms
Jul 11, 2026152 ms
Jul 18, 2026151 ms
Jul 25, 2026152 ms
Aug 1, 2026149 ms
Aug 8, 2026149 ms
Aug 15, 2026145 ms
Aug 22, 2026148 ms
Aug 29, 2026152 ms
Sep 5, 2026161 ms
Sep 12, 2026172 ms
Sep 19, 2026176 ms
Sep 26, 2026178 ms
Oct 3, 2026173 ms
Oct 10, 2026173 ms
Oct 17, 2026168 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of astronacci.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. astronacci.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  2. astronacci.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  3. astronacci.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  4. astronacci.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  5. astronacci.com at 8.3 s8.3 s
  6. astronacci.com at 9.9 s9.9 s
  7. astronacci.com at 11.6 s11.6 s
  8. astronacci.com at 13.3 s13.3 s

astronacci.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

12 to fix46
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7.6 s · 12.1 MB

    65 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (12.1 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    12.8 s · 1.9 MB

    About 1.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 12.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.9 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.9 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    3.1 s · 558 KiB

    About 558 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 10.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    700 ms · 3.4 MB

    16 images could be 3.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 700 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 3.1 MB and 970 ms of main-thread time.

  • YouTube adds 579 ms

    579 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 579 ms of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    450 ms · 42 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 142 ms

    142 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 142 ms of main-thread work and 313 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • tidio.co adds 71 ms

    71 ms

    tidio.co costs a phone 71 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 110 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 222 ms

    222 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 222 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 53.7 s

    53.7 s

    Your largest element takes 53.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 21.4 s

    21.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 21.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 60.0 s

    60.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 60.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 29% slower for real visitors

    +29%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 401 ms

    401 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 401 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 179 ms to 168 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 199 ms

    199 ms

    Real visitors wait 199 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004

    0.004

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix28
  • Page weight: 23.9 MB in 156 requests

    23.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 23.9 MB in 156 requests on a phone: images 10.8 MB (50), media 8.5 MB (3) and scripts 3.3 MB (44). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images over 500 KB

    8 images weigh 5.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 27 images in older formats

    27 images (8.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 8 images below the first screen load straight away

    8 images further down the page (2.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    426 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mercury-retrograde-trading-2026-mobile.jpg at 976 px wide, shown at 290 px. Resized copies would save about 426 KiB.

  • About 6.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.77 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.77 g of CO₂e: 813.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 8087
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 4 images without alt text

    4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h1 → h3 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 11 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8384
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“ASTROLOGY TRADING”, “ASTRONACCI” and “ASTRONACCI”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 102 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 102 pages on astronacci.com and 19 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “Metode analisa saham dengan menggabungkan ilmu Financial Astrology dan Fibonacci yang akurat. Pelajari investasi saham …”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Astronacci | Analisa dan Rekomendasi Saham, IHSG, Forex & Gold”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://astronacci.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (924 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix67
  • 1 page without a title

    /chart has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 10 pages share a title

    /, /about, /blog, /career, /calculator and /performance and 4 others all use the title “Astronacci | Analisa dan Rekomendasi Saham, IHSG, Forex & Gold”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /chart has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 9 pages share a meta description

    /about, /blog, /career, /calculator, /performance and /blog/astronacci-method and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /chart has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    /blog, /chart, /tempat-trading-terpercaya and /tes-kebutuhan-anda have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    /career, /chart, /calculator, /performance, /blog/read/saham-enrg-ij-membentuk-base-pattern-berpotensi-menguat-ke-rp-995 and /blog/read/cara-trading-gold-xau-usd-untuk-pemula-analisis-dan-manajemen-risiko and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6983
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

3 to fix79
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://astronacci.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HTTP/1.1 only

    The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://bit.ly/privateastro.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (astronacci.com).

  • Valid certificate (32 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for astronacci.com and is valid for another 32 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • All 52 links work

    All 52 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 12 external) answered without errors; 6 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 50 days

    astronacci.com is registered until Dec 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    astronacci.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    astronacci.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 16 years old

    16 years

    astronacci.com was registered in Dec 2009 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

4 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 29 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 336 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 336 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be astronacci.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:103.139.175.88 +ip4:210.247.248.181 +include:spf.mailjet.com +ip4:103.29.215.131 +include:_spf.googl…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It loads jQuery 3.4.1, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 64 issues on astronacci.com, including 23 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25