Website review, no card needed

bakeplus.nl logo

bakeplus.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202653 issues · 107 checks

This review found 53 issues worth fixing on bakeplus.nl, 20 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 172.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
133 ms91 msMay 2Oct 17113 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202699 ms
May 9, 202696 ms
May 16, 202697 ms
May 23, 2026105 ms
May 30, 2026108 ms
Jun 6, 2026112 ms
Jun 13, 2026109 ms
Jun 20, 2026104 ms
Jun 27, 2026111 ms
Jul 4, 2026113 ms
Jul 11, 2026114 ms
Jul 18, 2026113 ms
Jul 25, 2026112 ms
Aug 1, 2026112 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 2026116 ms
Aug 22, 2026118 ms
Aug 29, 2026119 ms
Sep 5, 2026121 ms
Sep 12, 2026121 ms
Sep 19, 2026128 ms
Sep 26, 2026126 ms
Oct 3, 2026120 ms
Oct 10, 2026117 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of bakeplus.nl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. bakeplus.nl at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. bakeplus.nl at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. bakeplus.nl at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. bakeplus.nl at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. bakeplus.nl at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. bakeplus.nl at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. bakeplus.nl at 6.4 s6.4 s
  8. bakeplus.nl at 7.3 s7.3 s

bakeplus.nl does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

16 to fix37
  • Improve image delivery

    11.1 s · 5.9 MB

    9 images could be 5.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 2.8 MB

    About 2.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 50). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cloudsuite.com and Hotjar and others), adding 5.1 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    900 ms · 161 KiB

    About 161 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 869 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (869 KiB).

  • Font display

    950 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 950 ms).

  • cloudsuite.com adds 394 ms

    394 ms

    cloudsuite.com costs a phone 394 ms of main-thread work and 3.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 556 ms

    556 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 556 ms of main-thread work and 534 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 402 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Hotjar adds 256 ms

    256 ms

    Hotjar costs a phone 256 ms of main-thread work and 65 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 148 ms

    148 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 148 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,724 HTML elements

    The page has 1,724 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • MailPlus adds 77 ms

    77 ms

    MailPlus costs a phone 77 ms of main-thread work and 411 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 27.8 s

    27.8 s

    Your largest element takes 27.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “International”.

  • Time to Interactive: 40.2 s

    40.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 40.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.1 s

    14.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 903 ms

    903 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 903 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.13

    0.13

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.118

    0.118

    The layout shifts by 0.118 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 99 ms to 113 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 124 ms

    124 ms

    Real visitors wait 124 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 12.0 MB in 64 requests

    12.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.0 MB in 64 requests on a phone: images 6.4 MB (16), scripts 4.6 MB (23) and fonts 880 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    NEW_R4_4206.png weighs 3.4 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    701 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example NEW_R4_4206.png at 1,200 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 701 KiB.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (4.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (4.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.40 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.40 g of CO₂e: 408.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 6985
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 14 links without text

    14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 8 form fields without a label

    8 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.

    Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 62 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9288
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 7 H1 headlines

    There are 7 <h1> headlines (“Jouw totaalleverancier!”, “Bakeplus Event” and “Maandacties oktober”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 357 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 357 pages on bakeplus.nl and 12 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “Bakeplus is een vooraanstaande leverancier van een compleet assortiment ingrediënten voor bakkers, banketbakkers, patis…”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Bakeplus partner voor Bakkers en IJsbereiders - Bakeplus”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.bakeplus.nl/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bakeplus.nl/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,104 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 151 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/ccm/collect?rcb=12&frm=0&apvc=1&tid=AW-16551217757&en=page_view&dl…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    201 of 205 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.bakesmart.nl/ (503).

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (bakeplus.nl).

  • Valid certificate (81 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for bakeplus.nl and is valid for another 81 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://bakeplus.nl redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    bakeplus.nl has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 19 years old

    19 years

    bakeplus.nl was registered in Sep 2007 through team.blue nl B.V.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    bakeplus.nl's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 814 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 814 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Neem contact op”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 5 email links.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a:twikey.com ip4:52.29.184.146 ip4:13.93.42.39 ip4:40.69.19.60 ip4:40.92.0.0/15 ip4:13.81.10.179 ip4:178.22.59.1…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 53 issues on bakeplus.nl, including 27 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25