Website review, no card needed
bakerdist.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202645 issues · 108 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on bakerdist.com, 18 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76C- #48,425 of 80,918 reviewed websitesbeats 35%
- #27,379 of 39,887 online storesbeats 27%
- #200 of 601 Magento storesbeats 62%
Closest competitors among Magento stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 143 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.4 s
1.9 s
2.4 s
2.9 s
3.3 s
3.8 s
bakerdist.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
6.5 s15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.5 s.
Minify JavaScript
4.2 s · 853 KiB853 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Reduce unused CSS
2.9 s · 595 KiBAbout 595 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 755 KiBAbout 755 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
2.3 s · 448 KiB448 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 411 KiB11 images could be 411 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,603 HTML elements
The page has 3,603 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Optanon and others), adding 928 KiB and 664 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 469 KiB84 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (469 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 368 ms
368 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 368 ms of main-thread work and 363 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 164 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
47 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 35 ms
35 msYour server sent the HTML in 35 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.9 s
17.9 sYour largest element takes 17.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Enter to Win a ZoomLock MAX Tool and Jaw Kit! ENTER NOW”.
First Contentful Paint: 7.2 s
7.2 sThe first text or image appears after 7.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 23.7 s
23.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.4 s
8.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.283
0.283The layout shifts by 0.283 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
49 images without width and height
49 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 324 ms
324 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 324 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 143 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 144 ms
144 msReal visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.6 MB in 255 requests
5.6 MBYour homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 255 requests on a phone: images 2.5 MB (128), scripts 2.2 MB (88) and stylesheets 598 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
13 images in older formats
13 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (621 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
30 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example simpleproposal-example-pages.png at 943 px wide, shown at 280 px. Resized copies would save about 30 KiB.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.59 g of CO₂e: 191.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (10 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 76 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Browse Our Product Lines”, “Browse Top Brands from Leading Manufacturers” and “Find Contractor Tools & Technology”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
22 links with vague text
22 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.bakerdist.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
635 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 635 pages on bakerdist.com and 11 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 158 characters
Your meta description is 158 characters: “Baker Distributing is the preferred choice in HVAC, Refrigeration & Foodservice equipment, parts and supplies distribut…”.
Title: 39 characters
Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Baker Distributing | Baker Distributing”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,960 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages share a meta description
/brands, /events, /contact-us, /baker-online-rewards, /proadvantage and /refrigerant-regulations use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
5 pages without an H1
/brands, /events, /contact-us, /support-after-hours-emergency and /credit have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 194 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
15 small tap targets
15 of 66 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Sending form data to 'https://www.facebook.com/tr/' violates the following report-only Content Security Policy directiv…”.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 180 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
5 links through redirect chains
5 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.bakerdist.com/warranty/.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (bakerdist.com).
Valid certificate (37 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for bakerdist.com and is valid for another 37 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://bakerdist.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 48 links work
All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 63 days
bakerdist.com is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.
No CAA record
bakerdist.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
2 checks passed
Domain is 29 years old
29 yearsbakerdist.com was registered in Jan 1997 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
DNSSEC is on
bakerdist.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Content and conversion
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 633 words of copy
The homepage carries about 633 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE” and “START A CASE TODAY”.
41 calls to action
The homepage has 41 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Quick Order” and “Learn more”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:l1s7fk5eha.powerspf.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Magento
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on bakerdist.com, including 23 speed issues and 7 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.