Website review, no card needed

bbr.com logo

bbr.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202641 issues · 109 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on bbr.com, 14 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.9 sMay 9Oct 243.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
283 ms147 msMay 9Oct 24165 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026253 ms
May 16, 2026243 ms
May 23, 2026244 ms
May 30, 2026248 ms
Jun 6, 2026262 ms
Jun 13, 2026266 ms
Jun 20, 2026267 ms
Jun 27, 2026264 ms
Jul 4, 2026260 ms
Jul 11, 2026264 ms
Jul 18, 2026255 ms
Jul 25, 2026242 ms
Aug 1, 2026230 ms
Aug 8, 2026211 ms
Aug 15, 2026196 ms
Aug 22, 2026187 ms
Aug 29, 2026172 ms
Sep 5, 2026173 ms
Sep 12, 2026177 ms
Sep 19, 2026176 ms
Sep 26, 2026173 ms
Oct 3, 2026172 ms
Oct 10, 2026171 ms
Oct 17, 2026163 ms
Oct 24, 2026165 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of bbr.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. bbr.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. bbr.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. bbr.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. bbr.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. bbr.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. bbr.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  7. bbr.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. bbr.com at 5.1 s5.1 s

bbr.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix34
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 1.3 MB

    31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 s · 319 KiB

    3 images could be 319 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 860 KiB

    About 860 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, frontapp.com and Optanon and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 473 ms

    473 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 473 ms of main-thread work and 540 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • frontapp.com adds 444 ms

    444 ms

    frontapp.com costs a phone 444 ms of main-thread work and 684 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 483 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 38 KiB

    About 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 20 ms

    20 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.18

    1.18

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.2 s

    10.2 s

    Your largest element takes 10.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “A moody shot of Champagne Bollinger in bottle and magnum fo…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.9 s

    21.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 271 ms

    271 ms

    Real visitors wait 271 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 34% faster for real visitors

    -34%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 253 ms to 165 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.078

    0.078

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.078, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 3.7 MB in 119 requests

    3.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 119 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (25), images 1.4 MB (24) and fonts 242 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    355 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Christmas-photos-film-2026-Bollinger-regular-and-magnum-2 at 2,731 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 355 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (63 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.04 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.04 g of CO₂e: 124.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9392
  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 25 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10086
  • Title is long (66 characters)

    Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Berry Bros. & Rudd | Britain’s oldest fine wine & spirits merchant”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 308 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 308 pages on bbr.com and 10 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “Shop exceptional wines and spirits from Berry Bros. & Rudd, a historic London merchant with over 325 years of expertise…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “25% off Bollinger”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.bbr.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bbr.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler

    robots.txt blocks CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,290 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    /winter-sale and /winter-sale-collecting all use the title “Winter Sale | Savings on Fine Wines & Spirits”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /winter-sale and /winter-sale-collecting use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /winter-sale-collecting, whose canonical is /winter-sale. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /winter-sale-further-reductions took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 198 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Refused to set unsafe header "cookie"”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://instagram.com/berrybrosrudd.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (bbr.com).

  • Valid certificate (88 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for bbr.com and is valid for another 88 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://bbr.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 50 links work

    All 50 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 10 external) answered without errors; 4 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    bbr.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    bbr.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    bbr.com was registered in Oct 1997 through Tucows Domains Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Oct 2028

    bbr.com is registered until Oct 2028.

Content and conversion

4 to fix75
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 541 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 541 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BUY SPECIAL CUVÉE” and “BUY ROSÉ”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Start Hill Farm 2026”, “How to buy” and “Register to bid”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:eu._netblocks.mimecast.com include:amazonses.com include:email-od.com include:_spf.elasticemail.com incl…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Vue Storefront 2
Framework
Nuxt
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Fastly

Company

Founded
1698
Headquarters
London

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on bbr.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25