Website review, no card needed

better.com logo

better.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202630 issues · 99 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on better.com, 16 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 242.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
184 ms151 msMay 9Oct 24174 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026155 ms
May 16, 2026160 ms
May 23, 2026162 ms
May 30, 2026170 ms
Jun 6, 2026172 ms
Jun 13, 2026171 ms
Jun 20, 2026169 ms
Jun 27, 2026163 ms
Jul 4, 2026162 ms
Jul 11, 2026161 ms
Jul 18, 2026160 ms
Jul 25, 2026158 ms
Aug 1, 2026161 ms
Aug 8, 2026162 ms
Aug 15, 2026166 ms
Aug 22, 2026171 ms
Aug 29, 2026172 ms
Sep 5, 2026177 ms
Sep 12, 2026178 ms
Sep 19, 2026178 ms
Sep 26, 2026179 ms
Oct 3, 2026180 ms
Oct 10, 2026179 ms
Oct 17, 2026178 ms
Oct 24, 2026174 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of better.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. better.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. better.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. better.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. better.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  5. better.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  6. better.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  7. better.com at 7.7 s7.7 s
  8. better.com at 8.8 s8.8 s

better.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix36
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7.0 s · 1.5 MB

    59 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 930 KiB

    About 930 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 36). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and Facebook and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 800 ms

    800 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 800 ms of main-thread work and 573 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 289 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Maps adds 170 ms

    170 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 170 ms of main-thread work and 392 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    63 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 63 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Improve image delivery

    28 KiB

    3 images could be 28 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    19 KiB

    About 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.77

    0.77

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.77 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.6 s

    14.6 s

    Your largest element takes 14.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Betsy AI gets you cash from your home cheaper, faster, and …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.6 s

    23.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 155 ms to 174 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 130 ms

    130 ms

    Real visitors wait 130 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 761 ms

    761 ms

    Real visitors wait 761 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 172 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 172 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (57), fonts 439 KiB (8) and other files 74 KiB (79). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.79 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.79 g of CO₂e: 94.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 0 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10090
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • 56 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 56 pages on better.com and 2 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “Better Mortgage Corporation is a direct lender dedicated to providing a fast, transparent digital mortgage experience b…”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Simple, Online, AI-Powered Mortgage | Better Mortgage”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://better.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: FinancialService.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://better.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix75
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    16%

    A phone browser shows 1,046 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 167. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.

Other pages

5 to fix67
  • 1 page without a title

    /heloc-vs-cashout-refi-calculator has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 3 pages share a title

    /preapproval/nxt-purchase, /preapproval/nxt-refinance and /preapproval/nxt-heloc all use the title “Better Mortgage”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /heloc-vs-cashout-refi-calculator has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    /preapproval/nxt-purchase, /preapproval/nxt-refinance and /preapproval/nxt-heloc use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    /preapproval/nxt-purchase, /preapproval/nxt-refinance, /preapproval/nxt-heloc and /heloc-vs-cashout-refi-calculator have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    /preapproval/nxt-purchase, /preapproval/nxt-refinance and /preapproval/nxt-heloc have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7797
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    29 of 36 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (better.com).

  • Valid certificate (178 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for better.com and is valid for another 178 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://better.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 24 links work

    All 24 links checked from your homepage (23 internal, 1 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 23 days

    better.com is registered until Nov 2026. If it lapses, the site and its email stop working and someone else can buy the name. Renew it, and turn on auto-renew.

  • No CAA record

    better.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    better.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    better.com was registered in Nov 1996 through NameCheap, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,046 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,046 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get started” and “Start dictation”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Apply now”, “Rent vs buy calculator” and “Buy”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:better.com._nspf.vali.email include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads FullStory (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (TrustArc) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: TrustArc

    A consent management tool (TrustArc) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
CloudFront

Company

Founded
2016
Headquarters
New York City

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on better.com, including 17 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25