Website review, no card needed
bing.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 October 202624 issues · 70 checks
This review found 24 issues worth fixing on bing.com, 5 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 151 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 138 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.9 s
1.3 s
1.8 s
2.2 s
2.7 s
3.1 s
3.5 s
bing.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 s · 197 KiBAbout 197 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 73
73/100Your mobile performance score is 73 (desktop: 62). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
400 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 400 ms.
Improve image delivery
226 KiB20 images could be 226 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 157 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
21 KiB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (21 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
21 KiBAbout 21 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (live.com), adding 4 KiB and 2 ms of main-thread time.
3 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 712 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Page weight: 1.3 MB in 90 requests
1.3 MBYour homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 90 requests on a phone: images 472 KiB (26), other files 407 KiB (33) and scripts 394 KiB (24). That is a lean page.
Server response: 118 ms
118 msYour server sent the HTML in 118 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.6 s
5.6 sYour largest element takes 5.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “© Joe Raedle/Getty Images”.
Real-user TTFB: 806 ms
806 msReal visitors wait 806 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 6.4 s
6.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 6.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
20 images without width and height
20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Speed Index: 3.8 s
3.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.102
0.102The layout shifts by 0.102 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 161 ms
161 msReal visitors wait 161 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 155 ms to 138 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 156 ms
156 msScripts block the page for only 156 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sThe first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Accessibility
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
Title is short (23 characters)
Your title is only 23 characters: “Search - Microsoft Bing”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (168 characters)
Your meta description is 168 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
20 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 20 pages on bing.com and 20 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.bing.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bing.com/sitemap.xml.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “_w is not defined”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
http:// does not redirect
http://bing.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
5 broken external links
5 links to other sites are dead, for example https://www.msn.com/?ocid=BHEA000 (404).
8 links through redirect chains
8 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.bing.com/chat?FORM=hpcodx&intent=bing.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (bing.com).
Valid certificate (175 days left)
The certificate from Microsoft Corporation · Microsoft TLS G2 ECC CA OCSP 02 verifies for bing.com and is valid for another 175 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 3 words
The homepage has only about 3 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Learn more”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Email authentication
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
Privacy and tracking
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 24 issues on bing.com, including 10 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.