Website review, no card needed
biogreen.com.ar website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202652 issues · 106 checks
This review found 52 issues worth fixing on biogreen.com.ar, 23 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68D- #70,662 of 80,842 reviewed websitesbeats 11%
- #37,037 of 39,829 online storesbeats 6%
- #1,754 of 2,106 WooCommerce storesbeats 14%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 246 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 238 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 236 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 187 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
1.9 s
2.9 s
3.8 s
4.8 s
5.8 s
6.7 s
7.7 s
biogreen.com.ar does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
10.7 s · 12.0 MB142 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (12.0 MB).
Improve image delivery
2.4 s · 6.7 MB36 images could be 6.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
5.0 s34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.0 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 473 KiBAbout 473 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.9 s · 336 KiBAbout 336 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.1 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 44). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.0 MB and 576 ms of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 391 ms
391 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 391 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.6 s
A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Minify CSS
300 ms · 36 KiB36 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1,743 HTML elements
The page has 1,743 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
8 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 149 ms
149 msYour server sent the HTML in 149 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.8 s
18.8 sYour largest element takes 18.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 30.6 s
30.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 30.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.3 s
15.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.83
0.83The layout shifts by 0.83 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s
4.5 sThe first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
9 images without width and height
9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 193 ms
193 msReal visitors wait 193 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 24% faster for real visitors
-24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 246 ms to 187 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors
-15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 145 ms
145 msScripts block the page for only 145 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 13.4 MB in 162 requests
13.4 MBYour homepage downloads 13.4 MB in 162 requests on a phone: images 11.0 MB (61), scripts 1.2 MB (54) and stylesheets 437 KiB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
8 images over 500 KB
8 images weigh 5.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
1.3 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example maracuya-movil.jpg at 1,626 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.3 MB.
6 images in older formats
6 images (2.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
bomba-movil.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
12 images below the first screen load straight away
12 images further down the page (289 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.8 g of CO₂ per visit
3.80 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.80 g of CO₂e: 455.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
19 text elements with low contrast
19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
43 links without text
43 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h6 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 9 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (18 characters)
Your title is only 18 characters: “Biogreen Argentina”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (177 characters)
Your meta description is 177 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
109 internal links, 87 external
The homepage links to 109 pages on biogreen.com.ar and 87 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://biogreen.com.ar/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://biogreen.com.ar/sitemaps.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (468 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
9 linked pages hidden from search
/preguntas-frecuentes, /producto/organza-difusor, /productos/aromatizantes/ambientales, /productos/aromatizantes, /producto/capullos-de-lino-2 and /producto/elixir-dulces-suenos and 3 others are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
7 pages without a meta description
/notas-de-interes, /puntos-presenciales, /beneficios, /productos/aromatizantes/ambientales, /productos/aromatizantes and /productos/aceites-esenciales and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
8 pages without an H1
/contactanos, /sumate-a-biogreen, /puntos-presenciales, /beneficios, /producto/organza-difusor and /producto/capullos-de-lino-2 and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
14 pages slow to respond
/notas-de-interes, /contactanos, /preguntas-frecuentes, /sumate-a-biogreen, /puntos-presenciales and /beneficios and 8 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
109 small tap targets
109 of 189 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “no element is specified to initialize PerfectScrollbar”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (biogreen.com.ar).
Valid certificate (26 days left)
The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36 verifies for biogreen.com.ar and is valid for another 26 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://biogreen.com.ar redirects to the secure version.
All 57 links work
All 57 links checked from your homepage (37 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 28 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
biogreen.com.ar has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 28 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 336 words of copy
The homepage carries about 336 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
3 checks passed
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be biogreen.com.ar is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:esmsv.hostmar.com include:spf.hostmar.com a mx include:_spf.google.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 1.14.2; the current release is 7.1.3.
- 3 plugins are behind their latest release.woocommerce 9.3.6 → 11.2.1 · contact-form-7 6.0.6 → 6.2.3 · woo-custom-cart-button 1.6.1 → 2.0
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 1.14.2
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 52 issues on biogreen.com.ar, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.