Website review, no card needed

bioray.com logo

bioray.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202634 issues · 110 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on bioray.com, 12 of them high impact, across 110 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.1 sMay 16Oct 311.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.3 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 20261.2 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Oct 24, 20261.2 s
Oct 31, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
119 ms92 msMay 16Oct 31115 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026104 ms
May 23, 2026103 ms
May 30, 2026103 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 202699 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202695 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202696 ms
Jul 18, 2026101 ms
Jul 25, 2026104 ms
Aug 1, 2026104 ms
Aug 8, 2026108 ms
Aug 15, 2026109 ms
Aug 22, 2026107 ms
Aug 29, 2026108 ms
Sep 5, 2026111 ms
Sep 12, 2026112 ms
Sep 19, 2026116 ms
Sep 26, 2026116 ms
Oct 3, 2026113 ms
Oct 10, 2026113 ms
Oct 17, 2026112 ms
Oct 24, 2026113 ms
Oct 31, 2026115 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of bioray.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. bioray.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. bioray.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. bioray.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. bioray.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. bioray.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. bioray.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. bioray.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  8. bioray.com at 4.2 s4.2 s

bioray.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix63
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Main-thread work: 4.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and Clarity and others), adding 1.2 MB and 735 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 74 KiB

    About 74 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    465 KiB

    About 465 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Improve image delivery

    317 KiB

    11 images could be 317 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Shopify adds 214 ms

    214 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 214 ms of main-thread work and 443 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,833 HTML elements

    The page has 1,833 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 203 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    128 KiB

    30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (128 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    62 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 62 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    19 KiB

    19 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 21 ms

    21 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 22.1 s

    22.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Your largest element takes 5.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 362 ms

    362 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 362 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 115 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 522 ms

    522 ms

    Real visitors wait 522 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005

    0.005

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.0 MB in 316 requests

    4.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 316 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (122), other files 1.3 MB (125) and images 1.0 MB (50). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.15 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.15 g of CO₂e: 137.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8588
  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (8 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 23 images without alt text

    23 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (9 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8581
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (6 characters)

    Your title is only 6 characters: “Bioray”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 7 links with vague text

    7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 138 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 138 pages on bioray.com and 0 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 118 characters

    Your meta description is 118 characters: “BIORAY® products restore health and promote balance in the body. Safe and effective herbal formulas made for everyone.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.bioray.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bioray.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,382 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix83
  • 1 page without a meta description

    /pages/where-to-start-questionnaire has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 7 pages share a meta description

    /collections/discounted-bundles, /collections/restorative-programs, /collections/bioray%C2%AE-vault, /pages/about, /pages/bioray-difference and /blogs/resources and 1 other use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /collections/bioray%C2%AE-vault, whose canonical is /collections/bioray%c2%ae-vault. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /pages/where-to-start-questionnaire, /collections/all, /collections/bioray-infant, /collections/bioray-kids, /collections/rayz-for-teens and /collections/bioray-adult-daily and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 pages with very little text

    /pages/where-to-start-questionnaire, /collections/all, /collections/bioray-infant, /collections/bioray-kids, /collections/rayz-for-teens and /collections/bioray-adult-daily and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    20 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.bioray.com/account.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (bioray.com).

  • Valid certificate (48 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for bioray.com and is valid for another 48 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://bioray.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 40 links work

    All 40 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    bioray.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 23 years old

    23 years

    bioray.com was registered in Aug 2003 through Cloudflare, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    bioray.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Aug 2028

    bioray.com is registered until Aug 2028.

Content and conversion

100
  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 719 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 719 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Infant” and “Shop Kids”.

  • 26 calls to action

    The homepage has 26 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “SHOP ALL” and “SHOP INFANT”.

  • 9 short forms

    9 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 36 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and “1,300+ reviews”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be bioray.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com a:dispatch-us.ppe-hosted.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 38 cookies set on arrival

    38

    Opening the homepage sets 38 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 57 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 57 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

None of the apps your storefront loads is on the list of apps with a known security problem.

Apps your storefront loads

Okendo · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Autocart · Microsoft Clarity · Helium Customer Fields · Mida Fraud Ip Blocker · chimpstatic.com · oxiapps.com · amazonaws.com · zdops.net · retention.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Hiring

Hiring
2 open roles
Job board
jazzhr

Company

Headquarters
Irvine

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on bioray.com, including 14 speed issues and 3 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25