Website review, no card needed

bitbase.es logo

bitbase.es website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202650 issues · 93 checks

This review found 50 issues worth fixing on bitbase.es, 25 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 172.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
271 ms186 msMay 2Oct 17211 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026261 ms
May 9, 2026245 ms
May 16, 2026237 ms
May 23, 2026234 ms
May 30, 2026245 ms
Jun 6, 2026250 ms
Jun 13, 2026248 ms
Jun 20, 2026246 ms
Jun 27, 2026239 ms
Jul 4, 2026237 ms
Jul 11, 2026242 ms
Jul 18, 2026240 ms
Jul 25, 2026237 ms
Aug 1, 2026225 ms
Aug 8, 2026214 ms
Aug 15, 2026216 ms
Aug 22, 2026218 ms
Aug 29, 2026239 ms
Sep 5, 2026237 ms
Sep 12, 2026209 ms
Sep 19, 2026209 ms
Sep 26, 2026205 ms
Oct 3, 2026196 ms
Oct 10, 2026212 ms
Oct 17, 2026211 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of bitbase.es (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. bitbase.es at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. bitbase.es at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. bitbase.es at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. bitbase.es at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. bitbase.es at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. bitbase.es at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. bitbase.es at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. bitbase.es at 3.2 s3.2 s

bitbase.es does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

11 to fix27
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.2 s · 3.7 MB

    90 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.7 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 27

    27/100

    Your mobile performance score is 27 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and ZenDesk and others), adding 2.5 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 MB

    13 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google CDN adds 686 ms

    686 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 686 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 379 ms

    379 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 379 ms of main-thread work and 364 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ZenDesk adds 324 ms

    324 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 324 ms of main-thread work and 413 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,508 HTML elements

    The page has 2,508 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    270 ms · 14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 270 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 215 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 54 but mobile only 27. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.55

    0.55

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.55 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.8 s

    21.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 1

    1

    The layout shifts by 1 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Your largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Usamos cookies y otras técnicas de rastreo para mejorar tu …”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 543 ms

    543 ms

    Real visitors wait 543 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 261 ms to 211 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 6.3 MB in 140 requests

    6.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.3 MB in 140 requests on a phone: images 3.1 MB (66), scripts 2.5 MB (38) and other files 473 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Contacto.21872e54.svg weighs 1.3 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 10 images far larger than shown

    1.2 MB

    10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example bitbase_exchange_fisico_3785d41abf.jpg at 2,400 px wide, shown at 351 px. Resized copies would save about 1.2 MB.

  • 11 images in older formats

    11 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 13 images below the first screen load straight away

    13 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.78 g of CO₂e: 213.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8187
  • Images must have alternative text (41 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 41 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 26 text elements with low contrast

    26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (2 elements)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (55 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 55 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8371
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (187 characters)

    Your meta description is 187 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

3 checks passed
  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “BitBase - Comprar Bitcoin ahora es más fácil que nunca”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bitbase.es/sitemap/index.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 903 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    16 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (bitbase.es).

  • Valid certificate (77 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for bitbase.es and is valid for another 77 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://bitbase.es redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    bitbase.es has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 903 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 903 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be bitbase.es is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.odoo.com include:trustpilotservice.com include:_spf.google.com include:secureserver.net include:sho…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 50 issues on bitbase.es, including 20 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25