Website review, no card needed
blomea.pl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202640 issues · 89 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on blomea.pl, 13 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 16.6 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #65,908 of 89,224 reviewed websitesbeats 23%
- #38,101 of 46,543 online storesbeats 15%
- #35,307 of 41,792 Shopify storesbeats 13%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 215 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 220 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 16.6 s
A phone's processor spends 16.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
6,293 HTML elements
The page has 6,293 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 61
61/100Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
400 ms · 477 KiB29 images could be 477 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
650 ms7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klaviyo, Clarity and Shopify and others), adding 901 KiB and 530 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
400 ms · 85 KiB9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (85 KiB).
Klaviyo adds 195 ms
195 msKlaviyo costs a phone 195 ms of main-thread work and 316 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 68 ms
68 msShopify costs a phone 68 ms of main-thread work and 464 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 130 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
112 KiBAbout 112 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Duplicated JavaScript
40 KiB40 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Reduce unused CSS
10 KiBAbout 10 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 18 ms
18 msYour server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.3 s
17.3 sYour largest element takes 17.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 17.4 s
17.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.0 s
10.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.7 s
3.7 sReal visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 293 ms
293 msReal visitors wait 293 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
25 images without width and height
25 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 254 ms
254 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 254 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 215 ms to 220 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 722 ms
722 msReal visitors wait 722 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 779 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 779 requests on a phone: images 3.8 MB (395), other files 1.5 MB (250) and scripts 714 KiB (87). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.84 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.84 g of CO₂e: 221.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
49 text elements with low contrast
49 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
96 form fields without a label
96 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (12 elements)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 11 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
507 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 507 pages on blomea.pl and 3 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 143 characters
Your meta description is 143 characters: “Ekologiczne nasiona za jedyne 12,99 zł – wszystkie w tej samej cenie. Znajdziesz tu duży wybór nasion i cebulek kwiatow…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Kalendarz adwentowy z nasionami już jest!”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Nasiona Ekologiczne | Ekologiczne nasiona za jedyne 12,99 zł”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://blomea.pl/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://blomea.pl/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (4,341 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
/policies/shipping-policy, /pages/germination-guarantee, /pages/contact, /pages/wishlist and /collections/ostatnia-szansa have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
/policies/shipping-policy, /pages/germination-guarantee, /pages/contact, /pages/wishlist, /products/kalendarz-adwentowy-z-nasionami-2026 and /collections/black-month and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
/collections/ostatnia-szansa and /collections/mikroliscie took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 197 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
62 of 72 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,626 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,626 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
81 short forms
81 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 63 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
27 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at blomea.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
No apps were seen in the code your storefront loads.
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on blomea.pl, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.