Website review, no card needed
bluestone.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202649 issues · 109 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on bluestone.com, 12 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 164 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 237 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.8 s
2.8 s
3.7 s
4.6 s
5.5 s
6.4 s
7.3 s
bluestone.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 2.6 MB61 images could be 2.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.1 MB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.1 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and WebEngage and others), adding 1.3 MB and 840 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
900 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 900 ms.
Document request latency
600 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 600 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
575 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 575 ms on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 431 ms
431 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 431 ms of main-thread work and 726 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.6 s
A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,726 HTML elements
The page has 2,726 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Server response: 675 ms
675 msYour server takes 675 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 77 KiBAbout 77 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 191 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.0 s
11.0 sYour largest element takes 11.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 25.0 s
25.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.5 s
11.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 307 ms
307 msReal visitors wait 307 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors
+43%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 168 ms to 237 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 71% slower for real visitors
+71%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 232 ms
232 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 232 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.4 MB in 157 requests
7.4 MBYour homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 157 requests on a phone: images 3.5 MB (75), scripts 1.9 MB (23) and media 1.7 MB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images far larger than shown
618 KiB10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example BS-MC-Offer_Oct_Mobile-Carousel-Sale-Banner---1500-x-1674.jp at 1,500 px wide, shown at 375 px. Resized copies would save about 618 KiB.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images in older formats
2 images (862 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.09 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.09 g of CO₂e: 251.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
32 text elements with low contrast
32 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
12 links without text
12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (15 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 231 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (89 characters)
Your title is 89 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “BlueStone Online Jewellery Shopping Store - Buy Gold & Diamond Jewellery Designs In India”.
Meta description is long (246 characters)
Your meta description is 246 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
341 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 341 pages on bluestone.com and 7 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “BlueStone Jewellery Store - A Stellar Omnichannel Presence”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.bluestone.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, Product and VideoObject.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bluestone.com/products-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,499 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 linked pages hidden from search
/recently-viewed and /jewellery/valentines+curation.html are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
9 pages without a meta description
/jewellery/watch+jewellery.html, /jewellery/rings.html, /jewellery/earrings.html, /jewellery/pendants.html, /jewellery/preset+solitaires.html and /jewellery.html and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
/offer-landing.html has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
5 pages slow to respond
/jewellery/watch+jewellery.html, /jewellery/pendants.html, /jewellery/preset+solitaires.html, /jewellery.html and /jewellery/goldcoins.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 186 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://res.cloudinary.com/die12ywpb/image/upload/v1716182323/Logo_1_d3bnan.svg.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
14 distorted images
14 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
49 of 49 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
15 broken links to your own pages
15 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.bluestone.com/ (500).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
2 links through redirect chains
2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.bluestone.com/tah?cartType=videoCallTah.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (bluestone.com).
Valid certificate (105 days left)
The certificate from GoDaddy.com · GoDaddy TLS Intermediate CA DV - R1v1 verifies for bluestone.com and is valid for another 105 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://bluestone.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
bluestone.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
bluestone.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 19 years old
19 yearsbluestone.com was registered in Sep 2007 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Sep 2034
bluestone.com is registered until Sep 2034.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 23 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
About 769 words of copy
The homepage carries about 769 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
69 calls to action
The homepage has 69 calls to action, for example “Video call cart”, “Book Video Call” and “Add to video call cart”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:zohomail.in include:ncapp02.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ip4:103.94.240.178 ip4:103…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Snap Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
32 cookies set on arrival
32Opening the homepage sets 32 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Hiring
- Hiring
- 147 open roles
- Teams
- Executive Search (27), IT Jobs (14), AppDev (13), CyberSecurity (11)
- Job board
- smartrecruiters
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on bluestone.com, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.