Website review, no card needed

bode.co logo

bode.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202633 issues · 99 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on bode.co, 6 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s650 msMay 16Oct 31920 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 2026989 ms
Aug 29, 2026875 ms
Sep 5, 2026838 ms
Sep 12, 2026842 ms
Sep 19, 2026893 ms
Sep 26, 2026887 ms
Oct 3, 2026879 ms
Oct 10, 2026894 ms
Oct 17, 2026868 ms
Oct 24, 2026897 ms
Oct 31, 2026920 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
190 ms85 msMay 16Oct 31101 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026159 ms
May 23, 2026159 ms
May 30, 2026154 ms
Jun 6, 2026160 ms
Jun 13, 2026175 ms
Jun 20, 2026171 ms
Jun 27, 2026178 ms
Jul 4, 2026170 ms
Jul 11, 2026170 ms
Jul 18, 2026162 ms
Jul 25, 2026161 ms
Aug 1, 2026160 ms
Aug 8, 2026146 ms
Aug 15, 2026122 ms
Aug 22, 2026106 ms
Aug 29, 2026102 ms
Sep 5, 2026100 ms
Sep 12, 2026103 ms
Sep 19, 2026106 ms
Sep 26, 2026105 ms
Oct 3, 2026105 ms
Oct 10, 2026105 ms
Oct 17, 2026101 ms
Oct 24, 202697 ms
Oct 31, 2026101 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of bode.co (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. bode.co at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. bode.co at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. bode.co at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. bode.co at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. bode.co at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. bode.co at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. bode.co at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. bode.co at 3.0 s3.0 s

bode.co does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix68
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.3 s · 601 KiB

    About 601 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 68

    68/100

    Your mobile performance score is 68. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and others), adding 2.4 MB and 707 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 107 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (107 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 231 ms

    231 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 231 ms of main-thread work and 325 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 181 ms

    181 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 181 ms of main-thread work and 477 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • website-files.com adds 71 ms

    71 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 71 ms of main-thread work and 827 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 26 ms

    26 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 26 ms of main-thread work and 508 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 151 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    16 KiB

    1 image could be 16 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    16 KiB

    About 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 701 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 17.2 s

    17.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Your largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Aerial view of the Bode Nashville courtyard at dusk with st…”.

  • Speed Index: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 230 ms

    230 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 230 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Real visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 270 ms

    270 ms

    Real visitors wait 270 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 38% faster for real visitors

    -38%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 159 ms to 101 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 44% faster for real visitors

    -44%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 2.6 MB in 99 requests

    2.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 99 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (37), fonts 572 KiB (7) and other files 449 KiB (34). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    6ac7e5db013c81f7233c1cfc_bode-nashville-hotel-courtyard-twil is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.73 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.73 g of CO₂e: 88.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 13 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 13 pages on bode.co and 4 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “Bode goes beyond hotels to create a new way of staying, meant for new ways of living with group-friendly accommodations…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Travel Better Together”.

  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Modern Apartment Hotels | Bode - A New Vision of Hospitality”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.bode.co/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bode.co/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without an H1

    /contact-us has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /contact-us has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 6 internal pages checked

    We fetched 6 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 6 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 6 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 12 small tap targets

    12 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 third-party cookies

    4 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://data.stbuttons.click/data' from origin 'https://www.bode.co' has been blocked by C…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (bode.co).

  • Valid certificate (60 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for bode.co and is valid for another 60 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://bode.co redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 11 links work

    All 11 links checked from your homepage (7 internal, 4 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    bode.co has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

3 to fix79
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 123 words

    The homepage has only about 123 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK NOW”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Book Now” and “Subscribe”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

1 to fix45
  • No DMARC policy

    bode.co has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • Email authentication score: 45/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:ivvy.net include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 28 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Webflow

Hiring

Hiring
12 open roles
Teams
Food & Beverage (5), Rooms (5), 60 SALES & MARKETING (1), Sales & Marketing (1)
Job board
rippling

Company

Headquarters
Irvine

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on bode.co, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25