Website review, no card needed

carrot.com logo

carrot.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202625 issues · 93 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on carrot.com, 5 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.0 sMay 2Oct 172.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.8 s
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
204 ms149 msMay 2Oct 17155 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026183 ms
May 9, 2026178 ms
May 16, 2026180 ms
May 23, 2026178 ms
May 30, 2026195 ms
Jun 6, 2026194 ms
Jun 13, 2026196 ms
Jun 20, 2026198 ms
Jun 27, 2026185 ms
Jul 4, 2026178 ms
Jul 11, 2026172 ms
Jul 18, 2026163 ms
Jul 25, 2026158 ms
Aug 1, 2026164 ms
Aug 8, 2026167 ms
Aug 15, 2026178 ms
Aug 22, 2026183 ms
Aug 29, 2026180 ms
Sep 5, 2026178 ms
Sep 12, 2026169 ms
Sep 19, 2026169 ms
Sep 26, 2026161 ms
Oct 3, 2026172 ms
Oct 10, 2026164 ms
Oct 17, 2026155 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of carrot.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. carrot.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. carrot.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. carrot.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. carrot.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. carrot.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. carrot.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. carrot.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. carrot.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

carrot.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

2 to fix68
  • Mobile performance score: 68

    68/100

    Your mobile performance score is 68 (desktop: 90). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 279 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (279 KiB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Google Tag Manager and VWO and others), adding 731 KiB and 431 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    100 ms · 127 KiB

    7 images could be 127 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    179 KiB

    About 179 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 149 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 563 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 142 ms

    142 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 142 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.291

    0.291

    The layout shifts by 0.291 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Your largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.12

    0.12

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 170 ms

    170 ms

    Real visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 183 ms to 155 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 23% faster for real visitors

    -23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 133 ms

    133 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 133 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.4 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

100
  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (55 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.32 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.32 g of CO₂e: 38.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.1 MB in 63 requests

    1.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.1 MB in 63 requests on a phone: scripts 585 KiB (13), images 344 KiB (33) and fonts 153 KiB (6). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9194
  • 36 text elements with low contrast

    36 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (65 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 65 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 75 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10085
  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Carrot: Lead Generation Websites for Local Businesses & Real Estate”.

  • Meta description is long (170 characters)

    Your meta description is 170 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 60 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 60 pages on carrot.com and 19 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Websites built for local business lead generation.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://carrot.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://carrot.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,948 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (52 KiB, 206 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 3 links through redirect chains

    3 links go through two or more redirects, for example http://carrot.com/our-performance-edge.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (carrot.com).

  • Valid certificate (60 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for carrot.com and is valid for another 60 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://carrot.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 49 links work

    All 49 links checked from your homepage (33 internal, 16 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    carrot.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 30 years old

    30 years

    carrot.com was registered in Feb 1996 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only amazon.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for carrot.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Feb 2033

    carrot.com is registered until Feb 2033.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • A 11-field form

    Your longest form asks for 11 fields (1 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 3,207 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 3,207 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “PRICING” and “DEMO: SEE HOW IT WORKS”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Demo”, “Contact Carrot” and “Pricing”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks, 12 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and PostHog.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:infusionmail.com include:spf.mail.intercom.io include:mailgun.org include:_spf.google.com include:242974…”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 3.7.1
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | PostHog

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 25 issues on carrot.com, including 11 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25