Website review, no card needed
celtics.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202649 issues · 91 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on celtics.com, 25 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
57FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 158 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 156 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
10.0 s · 2.1 MB96 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.1 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.2 s · 1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.2 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.1 s · 356 KiBAbout 356 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 16
16/100Your mobile performance score is 16. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.8 s
A phone's processor spends 5.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,233 HTML elements
The page has 3,233 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
500 ms · 704 KiB14 images could be 704 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, spreaker.com and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 2.4 MB and 880 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 351 ms
351 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 351 ms of main-thread work and 499 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
spreaker.com adds 223 ms
223 msspreaker.com costs a phone 223 ms of main-thread work and 294 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
celtics.com adds 31 ms
31 msceltics.com costs a phone 31 ms of main-thread work and 875 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 213 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
86 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 86 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 35 ms
35 msYour server sent the HTML in 35 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.52
0.52For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.52 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 25.9 s
25.9 sYour largest element takes 25.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “media-image”.
Time to Interactive: 34.0 s
34.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 34.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.6 s
9.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.537
0.537The layout shifts by 0.537 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 932 ms
932 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 932 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 269 ms
269 msReal visitors wait 269 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 158 ms to 156 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.1 MB in 176 requests
7.1 MBYour homepage downloads 7.1 MB in 176 requests on a phone: images 3.2 MB (65), scripts 2.8 MB (60) and stylesheets 425 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
110126.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
2.01 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.01 g of CO₂e: 241.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (2 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (11 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (3 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 9 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Jayson Tatum Earns 14th Career Player of the Week…”, “Keys to the Game: Rockets 109, Celtics 93” and “11/2 Game Preview: Celtics at Rockets”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
207 internal links, 84 external
The homepage links to 207 pages on celtics.com and 84 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 70 characters
Your meta description is 70 characters: “Boston Celtics live scores, game highlights, latest news, and updates.”.
Title: 63 characters
Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Boston Celtics - Get the Latest Celtics Scores, Schedule & News”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.nba.com/celtics/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, SportsTeam and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.nba.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 2 AI answer engine crawlers
2 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (673 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
/nets has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 page without a meta description
/nets has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
/nets, /pacers, /hawks and /heat have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
/pacers, /bucks and /hawks have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 101 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
101 small tap targets
101 of 149 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 995 words of copy
The homepage carries about 995 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “FULL SCHEDULE” and “SCHEDULE”.
22 calls to action
The homepage has 22 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Schedule” and “2026‑27 Season Schedule”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at celtics.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Akamai
Company
- Founded
- 1946
- Headquarters
- Boston
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on celtics.com, including 25 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.