Website review, no card needed

chicos.com logo

chicos.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202650 issues · 112 checks

This review found 50 issues worth fixing on chicos.com, 16 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
8.4 s2.3 sApr 18Oct 33.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20267.4 s
Apr 25, 20267.7 s
May 2, 20267.5 s
May 9, 20267.1 s
May 16, 20266.7 s
May 23, 20266.5 s
May 30, 20266.5 s
Jun 6, 20266.4 s
Jun 13, 20266.5 s
Jun 20, 20266.6 s
Jun 27, 20266.5 s
Jul 4, 20266.4 s
Jul 11, 20266.3 s
Jul 18, 20265.9 s
Jul 25, 20265.5 s
Aug 1, 20265.3 s
Aug 8, 20265.2 s
Aug 15, 20265.0 s
Aug 22, 20264.7 s
Aug 29, 20264.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
975 ms228 msApr 18Oct 3434 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026889 ms
Apr 25, 2026785 ms
May 2, 2026599 ms
May 9, 2026513 ms
May 16, 2026438 ms
May 23, 2026404 ms
May 30, 2026405 ms
Jun 6, 2026413 ms
Jun 13, 2026411 ms
Jun 20, 2026389 ms
Jun 27, 2026371 ms
Jul 4, 2026352 ms
Jul 11, 2026342 ms
Jul 18, 2026334 ms
Jul 25, 2026326 ms
Aug 1, 2026319 ms
Aug 8, 2026314 ms
Aug 15, 2026325 ms
Aug 22, 2026343 ms
Aug 29, 2026370 ms
Sep 5, 2026406 ms
Sep 12, 2026429 ms
Sep 19, 2026450 ms
Sep 26, 2026456 ms
Oct 3, 2026434 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of chicos.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. chicos.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. chicos.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  3. chicos.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  4. chicos.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  5. chicos.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  6. chicos.com at 8.0 s8.0 s
  7. chicos.com at 9.3 s9.3 s
  8. chicos.com at 10.6 s10.6 s

chicos.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

14 to fix28
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.3 s · 2.4 MB

    177 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.4 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Main-thread work: 15.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 15.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 12.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 28

    28/100

    Your mobile performance score is 28. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    720 ms · 1.6 MB

    About 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 720 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ContentSquare and Facebook and others), adding 2.2 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    711 KiB

    12 images could be 711 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 483 ms

    483 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 483 ms of main-thread work and 858 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 436 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 61 KiB

    About 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • ContentSquare adds 299 ms

    299 ms

    ContentSquare costs a phone 299 ms of main-thread work and 199 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,765 HTML elements

    The page has 1,765 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Curalate adds 82 ms

    82 ms

    Curalate costs a phone 82 ms of main-thread work and 354 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • audioeye.com adds 48 ms

    48 ms

    audioeye.com costs a phone 48 ms of main-thread work and 323 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 133 KiB

    133 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 116 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 116 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 50 ms

    50 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 50 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    Your largest element takes 12.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Flash sale $50 off your $200+ purchase plus 25% off full pr…”.

  • Speed Index: 25.1 s

    25.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 25.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 42.5 s

    42.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 42.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 384 ms

    384 ms

    Real visitors wait 384 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.12

    0.12

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 911 ms

    911 ms

    Real visitors wait 911 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 47% faster for real visitors

    -47%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 889 ms to 434 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 60% faster for real visitors

    -60%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 7.4 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 6.6 MB in 335 requests

    6.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 335 requests on a phone: scripts 4.8 MB (176), images 1.2 MB (32) and other files 256 KiB (96). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Hero50OFF_10.12-M.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.88 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.88 g of CO₂e: 225.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8690
  • 16 buttons without a name

    16 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Images must have alternative text (1 element)

    Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9287
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 83 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 83 pages on chicos.com and 10 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 136 characters

    Your meta description is 136 characters: “Shop Chico's for the latest styles in women's clothing including missy, petite and tall, jewelry & accessories. Availab…”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Women's Clothing & Apparel Online & In-Store | Chico's”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.chicos.com/store.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.chicos.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,050 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (195 KiB, 179 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

5 to fix76
  • 2 pages share a title

    /store and / all use the title “Women's Clothing & Apparel Online & In-Store | Chico's”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /store/page/credit has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    /, /store/category/sale/catsaleschicos, /store/category/limited-time-offer/cat37949281 and /store/order-lookup use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is /store. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    /, /store/category/sale/catsaleschicos, /store/category/limited-time-offer/cat37949281, /store/order-lookup, /store/category/clothing/cat11199290 and /store/category/shoes-accessories/cat14609299 and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /store/order-lookup has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /locations took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 16 small tap targets

    16 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'carousels')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example http://www.chicosfas.com/ (404).

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://chicos.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • 4 links through redirect chains

    4 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.chicos.com/store/category/dresses+skirts/cat40004/?_ics=1706808620672&irclickid=~14YOIHLHywmrszFKIJPWMDEGIORSNVSNRJzGHxypmi~2YWLJFvri.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (chicos.com).

  • Valid certificate (109 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 verifies for chicos.com and is valid for another 109 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://chicos.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    chicos.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    chicos.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    chicos.com was registered in Mar 1997 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2028

    chicos.com is registered until Mar 2028.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,027 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,027 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Now” and “SHOP NOW”.

  • 19 calls to action

    The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Shop Now”, “Order Summary$0.00” and “SHOP NOW”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be chicos.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a mx ip4:63.170.11.0/24 ip4:204.76.254.50 ip4:107.20.210.250 ip4:52.1.14.157 ip4:107.23.16.222 ip4:54.173.83.138…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 27 cookies set on arrival

    27

    Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 50 issues on chicos.com, including 24 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25