Website review, no card needed
chico.ca website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202637 issues · 102 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on chico.ca, 17 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78C- #39,987 of 81,078 reviewed websitesbeats 45%
- #23,159 of 40,017 online storesbeats 37%
- #672 of 2,107 WooCommerce storesbeats 63%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 134 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
13.0 s · 2.7 MB11 images could be 2.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 13.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.9 s19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 325 KiBAbout 325 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 66). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 233 KiBAbout 233 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, wonderpush.com and TikTok and others), adding 807 KiB and 427 ms of main-thread time.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 84 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
46 KiB9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (46 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
36 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 36 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.4 s
A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 723 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 9.6 s
9.6 sThe first text or image appears after 9.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 31.4 s
31.4 sYour largest element takes 31.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Nous et nos partenaires tiers utilisons des cookies et des …”.
Time to Interactive: 32.1 s
32.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.8 s
12.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 134 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 145 ms
145 msReal visitors wait 145 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 53% faster for real visitors
-53%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.07
0.07The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.07, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 21 ms
21 msScripts block the page for only 21 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 15.0 MB in 149 requests
15.0 MBYour homepage downloads 15.0 MB in 149 requests on a phone: images 7.4 MB (45), media 6.2 MB (2) and scripts 709 KiB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
Untitled-29-mai-2026-a-10-h-50-min-11-s.png weighs 2.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image far larger than shown
789 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Untitled-29-mai-2026-a-10-h-50-min-11-s.png at 1,080 px wide, shown at 288 px. Resized copies would save about 789 KiB.
13 images in older formats
13 images (3.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
21 images below the first screen load straight away
21 images further down the page (1.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.2 g of CO₂ per visit
4.24 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.24 g of CO₂e: 508.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
34 text elements with low contrast
34 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 40 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (170 characters)
Your meta description is 170 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/logo-chico.svg")”.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
153 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 153 pages on chico.ca and 16 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Économisez avec notre circulaire”.
Title: 61 characters
Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Chico - La boutique préférée de tous les animaux du quartier!”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.chico.ca/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.chico.ca/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers
Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
2 checks passed
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (573 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
12 pages without a meta description
/circulaire, /produits/chiens/nourritures-et-gateries/nourritures, /produits/chiens/nourritures-et-gateries/gateries, /produits/chiens/nourritures-et-gateries/tendon-et-oreilles, /produits/chiens/nourritures-et-gateries/supplements and /produits/chiens/nourritures-et-gateries/accessoires-alimentaires-chiens and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 99 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Requests the geolocation permission on page load.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
18 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.youtube.com/@chico-boutiquedanimaux2028 (404).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (chico.ca).
Valid certificate (51 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for chico.ca and is valid for another 51 days.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://chico.ca redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
chico.ca has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
chico.ca's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 18 years old
18 yearschico.ca was registered in Mar 2008 through Go Daddy Domains Canada, Inc. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Mar 2030
chico.ca is registered until Mar 2030.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 357 words of copy
The homepage carries about 357 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be chico.ca is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a:petvalu.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, The Trade Desk and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 1.14.2; the current release is 7.1.3.
- 2 plugins are behind their latest release.woocommerce 11.1.2 → 11.2.1 · woocommerce-multilingual 5.5.8 → 5.6.3
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 1.14.2
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on chico.ca, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.