Website review, no card needed
compasslog.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202639 issues · 96 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on compasslog.com, 16 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 90 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 98 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 103 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
17.3 s · 3.9 MB7 images could be 3.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 17.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 192 KiBAbout 192 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 78). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 38 KiBAbout 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Google Fonts and others), adding 390 KiB and 258 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 7 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 126 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.6 s
A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 303 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 27 ms
27 msYour server sent the HTML in 27 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.7 s
24.7 sYour largest element takes 24.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Compass Logistics International is at home in the world’s g…”.
Time to Interactive: 24.7 s
24.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.6 s
11.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.9 s
4.9 sThe first text or image appears after 4.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 90 ms to 103 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 100 ms
100 msReal visitors wait 100 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 86 ms
86 msScripts block the page for only 86 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.8 MB in 24 requests
4.8 MBYour homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 24 requests on a phone: images 4.3 MB (10), scripts 403 KiB (7) and fonts 62 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
ship cropped.png weighs 3.4 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
2.9 MB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example ship cropped.png at 1,381 px wide, shown at 200 px. Resized copies would save about 2.9 MB.
7 images in older formats
7 images (4.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (4.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.36 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.36 g of CO₂e: 162.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 36 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (17 characters)
Your title is only 17 characters: “HOME | COMPASSLOG”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (165 characters)
Your meta description is 165 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.compasslog.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at compasslog.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
37 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 37 pages on compasslog.com and 10 external pages.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (283 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 linked pages are broken
Your homepage links to /shop.html, /shop-single.html, /shop-cart.html and /shop-account.html, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.
7 pages without an H1
/services-airfreight, /services-seafreight, /services-tankcontainer, /services-customsclearance, /services-localandcrossborder and /terms-and-conditions and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
13 internal pages checked
We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 9 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
5 broken links to your own pages
5 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.compasslog.com/shop.html (404).
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (compasslog.com).
Valid certificate (56 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for compasslog.com and is valid for another 56 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://compasslog.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
compasslog.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
compasslog.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 20 years old
20 yearscompasslog.com was registered in Jun 2006 through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jun 2027
compasslog.com is registered until Jun 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 230 words
The homepage has only about 230 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Shop” and “Shop Single”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 1 email link.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:103.187.238.29 include:spf.antispamcloud.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “default”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It loads jQuery 2.2.4, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Netlify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on compasslog.com, including 14 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.