Website review, no card needed

condenast.co.uk logo

condenast.co.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202644 issues · 101 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on condenast.co.uk, 16 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 17.2 MB in 69 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.0 s1.3 sMay 9Oct 244.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20264.1 s
Jul 4, 20264.4 s
Jul 11, 20264.3 s
Jul 18, 20264.2 s
Jul 25, 20264.4 s
Aug 1, 20264.4 s
Aug 8, 20264.4 s
Aug 15, 20264.6 s
Aug 22, 20264.6 s
Aug 29, 20264.6 s
Sep 5, 20264.5 s
Sep 12, 20264.4 s
Sep 19, 20264.3 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.1 s
Oct 10, 20264.3 s
Oct 17, 20264.4 s
Oct 24, 20264.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
180 ms139 msMay 9Oct 24162 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026144 ms
May 16, 2026145 ms
May 23, 2026146 ms
May 30, 2026148 ms
Jun 6, 2026150 ms
Jun 13, 2026150 ms
Jun 20, 2026153 ms
Jun 27, 2026151 ms
Jul 4, 2026151 ms
Jul 11, 2026149 ms
Jul 18, 2026149 ms
Jul 25, 2026152 ms
Aug 1, 2026151 ms
Aug 8, 2026150 ms
Aug 15, 2026150 ms
Aug 22, 2026149 ms
Aug 29, 2026149 ms
Sep 5, 2026154 ms
Sep 12, 2026163 ms
Sep 19, 2026172 ms
Sep 26, 2026174 ms
Oct 3, 2026175 ms
Oct 10, 2026170 ms
Oct 17, 2026162 ms
Oct 24, 2026162 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of condenast.co.uk (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. condenast.co.uk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. condenast.co.uk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. condenast.co.uk at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. condenast.co.uk at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. condenast.co.uk at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. condenast.co.uk at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. condenast.co.uk at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. condenast.co.uk at 3.0 s3.0 s

condenast.co.uk does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

6 to fix72
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 16.5 MB

    44 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 15.5 MB

    41 images could be 15.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Advance Magazine Group, conde.digital and cloudfront.net and others), adding 16.6 MB and 99 ms of main-thread time.

  • cloudfront.net adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 16.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 72

    72/100

    Your mobile performance score is 72. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    620 ms · 98 KiB

    About 98 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 103 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    100 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 100 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    67 KiB

    About 67 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 286 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    Real visitors wait 8.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 7.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    Real visitors wait 7.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 39.6 s

    39.6 s

    Your largest element takes 39.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 43.0 s

    43.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 43.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 148% slower for real visitors

    +148%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 144 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 135 ms

    135 ms

    Real visitors wait 135 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 27 ms

    27 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 27 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 17.2 MB in 69 requests

    17.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 17.2 MB in 69 requests on a phone: images 16.6 MB (47), scripts 418 KiB (13) and fonts 107 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 19 images far larger than shown

    11.8 MB

    19 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Bio_Habitat_Hotel_Colombia_4fe05f50b1.jpg at 4,900 px wide, shown at 256 px. Resized copies would save about 11.8 MB.

  • 9 images over 500 KB

    9 images weigh 10.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 32 images below the first screen load straight away

    32 images further down the page (13.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 19 images in older formats

    19 images (10.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.87 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.87 g of CO₂e: 584.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 7890
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 10 tap targets too small

    10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 76 links without text

    76 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 8259
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “Homepage | Condé Nast”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“We exist to create and champion the exceptional” and “We exist to create and champion the exceptional”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.condenast.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at condenast.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 139 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 139 pages on condenast.co.uk and 2 external pages.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (308 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /about, /brands, /advertising, /entertainment, /news and /careers and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    /contact, /brands/ad, /brands/allure, /brands/ars-technica, /brands/bon-appetit and /brands/conde-nast-johansens and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 pages with very little text

    /brands, /brands/allure, /brands/ars-technica, /brands/bon-appetit, /brands/conde-nast-johansens and /brands/epicurious have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 36 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    77 of 79 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://condenast.co.uk goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (condenast.com).

  • Valid certificate (173 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for condenast.co.uk and is valid for another 173 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://condenast.co.uk redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 39 links work

    All 39 links checked from your homepage (37 internal, 2 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    condenast.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    condenast.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 32 years old

    32 years

    condenast.com was registered in May 1994 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2027

    condenast.com is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

6 to fix43
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 280 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 280 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_u.condenast.co.uk._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on condenast.co.uk, including 15 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25