Website review, no card needed
condenast.co.uk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202644 issues · 101 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on condenast.co.uk, 16 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 17.2 MB in 69 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 162 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
condenast.co.uk does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 16.5 MB44 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 15.5 MB41 images could be 15.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Advance Magazine Group, conde.digital and cloudfront.net and others), adding 16.6 MB and 99 ms of main-thread time.
cloudfront.net adds 0 ms
0 mscloudfront.net costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 16.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 72
72/100Your mobile performance score is 72. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
620 ms · 98 KiBAbout 98 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 103 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
100 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 100 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
67 KiBAbout 67 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.7 s
A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 286 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 8.5 s
8.5 sReal visitors wait 8.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 7.9 s
7.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 7.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 7.1 s
7.1 sReal visitors wait 7.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 39.6 s
39.6 sYour largest element takes 39.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 43.0 s
43.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 43.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 148% slower for real visitors
+148%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 4.6 s
4.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 144 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 135 ms
135 msReal visitors wait 135 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s
0.9 sThe first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 27 ms
27 msScripts block the page for only 27 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 17.2 MB in 69 requests
17.2 MBYour homepage downloads 17.2 MB in 69 requests on a phone: images 16.6 MB (47), scripts 418 KiB (13) and fonts 107 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
19 images far larger than shown
11.8 MB19 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Bio_Habitat_Hotel_Colombia_4fe05f50b1.jpg at 4,900 px wide, shown at 256 px. Resized copies would save about 11.8 MB.
9 images over 500 KB
9 images weigh 10.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
32 images below the first screen load straight away
32 images further down the page (13.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
19 images in older formats
19 images (10.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit
4.87 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.87 g of CO₂e: 584.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
10 tap targets too small
10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
76 links without text
76 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (21 characters)
Your title is only 21 characters: “Homepage | Condé Nast”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“We exist to create and champion the exceptional” and “We exist to create and champion the exceptional”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.condenast.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at condenast.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
139 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 139 pages on condenast.co.uk and 2 external pages.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (308 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
/about, /brands, /advertising, /entertainment, /news and /careers and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 pages without an H1
/contact, /brands/ad, /brands/allure, /brands/ars-technica, /brands/bon-appetit and /brands/conde-nast-johansens and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages with very little text
/brands, /brands/allure, /brands/ars-technica, /brands/bon-appetit, /brands/conde-nast-johansens and /brands/epicurious have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 36 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
77 of 79 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
2 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://condenast.co.uk goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (condenast.com).
Valid certificate (173 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for condenast.co.uk and is valid for another 173 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://condenast.co.uk redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 39 links work
All 39 links checked from your homepage (37 internal, 2 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
condenast.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
condenast.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 32 years old
32 yearscondenast.com was registered in May 1994 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2027
condenast.com is registered until May 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 280 words of copy
The homepage carries about 280 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_u.condenast.co.uk._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on condenast.co.uk, including 15 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.