Website review, no card needed

condor.com logo

condor.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202649 issues · 111 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on condor.com, 23 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.7 sMay 16Oct 312.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Oct 24, 20262.8 s
Oct 31, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
379 ms321 msMay 16Oct 31335 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026362 ms
May 23, 2026354 ms
May 30, 2026353 ms
Jun 6, 2026351 ms
Jun 13, 2026353 ms
Jun 20, 2026356 ms
Jun 27, 2026362 ms
Jul 4, 2026369 ms
Jul 11, 2026372 ms
Jul 18, 2026370 ms
Jul 25, 2026358 ms
Aug 1, 2026348 ms
Aug 8, 2026343 ms
Aug 15, 2026341 ms
Aug 22, 2026342 ms
Aug 29, 2026336 ms
Sep 5, 2026336 ms
Sep 12, 2026334 ms
Sep 19, 2026330 ms
Sep 26, 2026330 ms
Oct 3, 2026329 ms
Oct 10, 2026328 ms
Oct 17, 2026330 ms
Oct 24, 2026333 ms
Oct 31, 2026335 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of condor.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. condor.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. condor.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. condor.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. condor.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. condor.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. condor.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  7. condor.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  8. condor.com at 4.1 s4.1 s

condor.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

14 to fix12
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.1 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    3.1 s · 387 KiB

    2 images could be 387 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.9 s · 405 KiB

    About 405 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.7 s · 510 KiB

    47 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (510 KiB).

  • Font display

    1.3 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.3 s).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 12

    12/100

    Your mobile performance score is 12. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.4 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Usercentrics CMP, Optimizely and mPulse and others), adding 1.5 MB and 524 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify JavaScript

    385 KiB

    385 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 53 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 53 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Usercentrics CMP adds 257 ms

    257 ms

    Usercentrics CMP costs a phone 257 ms of main-thread work and 274 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • condorcloud.net adds 27 ms

    27 ms

    condorcloud.net costs a phone 27 ms of main-thread work and 905 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 515 ms

    515 ms

    Real visitors wait 515 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.09

    1.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.2 s

    24.2 s

    Your largest element takes 24.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “To enable you to use our websites and app in a way that is …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.9 s

    30.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.824

    0.824

    The layout shifts by 0.824 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 362 ms to 335 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 736 ms

    736 ms

    Real visitors wait 736 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 5.4 MB in 127 requests

    5.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 127 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (41), images 1.6 MB (28) and fonts 1.1 MB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.54 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.54 g of CO₂e: 185.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8889
  • 11 tap targets too small

    11 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Hidden but focusable

    3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9294
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 171 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 171 pages on condor.com and 14 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 139 characters

    Your meta description is 139 characters: “Cheap Flights | Flights now available to world wide dream destinations. ☀️ Discover now Affordable Air Travel and Unbea…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Condor”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Cheap Flights | Discover Unbeatable Deals | Condor”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.condor.com/eu/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.condor.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (859 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix70
  • 1 page without a title

    /tca/eu/groupbooking/groupBookingSearch has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /tca/eu/groupbooking/groupBookingSearch has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /eu/book-plan/extras/seat-reservation.jsp, whose canonical is /eu/fly-enjoy/on-board/seats.jsp. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /eu/help-contact/faq.jsp and /tca/eu/groupbooking/groupBookingSearch have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 8 pages slow to respond

    /eu/book-plan/flights/rebooking-your-flight.jsp, /eu/book-plan/flight/flex-fare.jsp, /eu/book-plan/extras/seat-reservation.jsp, /eu/book-plan/extras/airport-parking.jsp, /eu/book-plan/extras/get-your-guide.jsp and /eu/book-plan/extras/climate-contribution.jsp and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 123 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'on')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://condor.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (condor.com).

  • Valid certificate (127 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · DigiCert Global G3 TLS ECC SHA384 2020 CA1 verifies for condor.com and is valid for another 127 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://condor.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 54 links work

    All 54 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 14 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    condor.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    condor.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 28 years old

    28 years

    condor.com was registered in May 1998 through HTTP.NET INTERNET GMBH. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2027

    condor.com is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 434 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 434 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Reserve your seat”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Book & Plan”, “Book & Plan Flights” and “Book & Plan Extras”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
TYPO3 CMS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Akamai

Company

Founded
1955
Headquarters
Frankfurt

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on condor.com, including 25 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25