Website review, no card needed

conning.com logo

conning.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202645 issues · 109 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on conning.com, 23 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.6 s1.3 sMay 9Oct 243.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.7 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.6 s
Oct 24, 20263.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
142 ms91 msMay 9Oct 24110 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026136 ms
May 16, 2026131 ms
May 23, 2026131 ms
May 30, 2026131 ms
Jun 27, 202697 ms
Jul 4, 2026104 ms
Jul 11, 2026105 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026106 ms
Aug 1, 2026101 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 2026111 ms
Aug 29, 2026119 ms
Sep 5, 202698 ms
Sep 12, 2026109 ms
Sep 19, 2026120 ms
Sep 26, 2026113 ms
Oct 3, 2026112 ms
Oct 10, 2026112 ms
Oct 17, 2026110 ms
Oct 24, 2026110 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of conning.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. conning.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. conning.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. conning.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. conning.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. conning.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. conning.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. conning.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. conning.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

conning.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix45
  • Improve image delivery

    2.2 s · 2.1 MB

    5 images could be 2.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.9 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 453 KiB

    About 453 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 264 KiB

    37 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (264 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and Optanon and others), adding 1.1 MB and 699 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 484 ms

    484 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 484 ms of main-thread work and 683 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 61 KiB

    About 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 168 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    39 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 709 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 32 ms

    32 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.2 s

    11.2 s

    Your largest element takes 11.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Investment Solutions Designed for Insurers Our deep investm…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.5 s

    15.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.352

    0.352

    The layout shifts by 0.352 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 89% slower for real visitors

    +89%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 113 ms

    113 ms

    Real visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 110 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 192 ms

    192 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 192 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.7 MB in 101 requests

    4.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 101 requests on a phone: images 3.3 MB (25), scripts 1.1 MB (30) and other files 73 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.33 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.33 g of CO₂e: 159.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 6278
  • 5 buttons without a name

    5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 57 text elements with low contrast

    57 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 16 images without alt text

    16 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

1 checks passed
  • 34 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8382
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“Investment Solutions Designed for Insurers”, “The Conning Advantage” and “We Value Diverse Voices”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 81 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 81 pages on conning.com and 13 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 109 characters

    Your meta description is 109 characters: “Conning is a leading global investment management firm with a long history of serving the insurance industry.”.

  • Title: 36 characters

    Your title is a healthy 36 characters: “Insurance Asset Management | Conning”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.conning.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,388 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 33 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 7 pages without a meta description

    /investment-expertise/investment-strategy-development, /investment-expertise/investment-accounting-and-reporting, /software-and-services/economic-scenario-generator, /software-and-services/portfolio-analysis, /insurance-expertise and /insurance-expertise/insurance-solutions and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 27 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the script 'https://qvdt3feo.com/events.js' violates the following Content Security Policy directive: "script-s…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (conning.com).

  • Valid certificate (109 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · DigiCert EV RSA CA G2 verifies for conning.com and is valid for another 109 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://conning.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 50 links work

    All 50 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 10 external) answered without errors; 2 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    conning.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    conning.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 30 years old

    30 years

    conning.com was registered in Nov 1995 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Nov 2031

    conning.com is registered until Nov 2031.

Content and conversion

5 to fix61
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 1,416 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,416 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:144.121.34.18/32 ip4:38.142.6.250/32 ip4:193.240.143.35/32 ip4:23.21.109.197 ip4:23.21.109.212 ip4:147.160.1…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Company

Founded
1912
Headquarters
Hartford

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on conning.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25