Website review, no card needed

connexity.com logo

connexity.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202643 issues · 83 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on connexity.com, 18 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s2.1 sMay 9Oct 243.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Oct 24, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
171 ms93 msMay 9Oct 24155 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026162 ms
May 16, 2026144 ms
May 23, 2026134 ms
May 30, 2026116 ms
Jun 6, 2026131 ms
Jun 13, 2026129 ms
Jun 20, 2026142 ms
Jun 27, 2026143 ms
Jul 4, 2026136 ms
Jul 11, 2026147 ms
Jul 18, 2026139 ms
Jul 25, 2026136 ms
Aug 1, 2026118 ms
Aug 8, 2026102 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 2026108 ms
Aug 29, 2026119 ms
Sep 5, 2026131 ms
Sep 12, 2026143 ms
Sep 19, 2026146 ms
Sep 26, 2026155 ms
Oct 3, 2026156 ms
Oct 10, 2026140 ms
Oct 17, 2026128 ms
Oct 24, 2026155 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of connexity.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. connexity.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. connexity.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. connexity.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. connexity.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. connexity.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. connexity.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  7. connexity.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. connexity.com at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

8 to fix58
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.7 s

    32 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.7 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.8 s · 510 KiB

    66 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (510 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 388 KiB

    About 388 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 897 KiB

    18 images could be 897 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 99 KiB

    About 99 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 195 ms

    195 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 195 ms of main-thread work and 379 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,795 HTML elements

    The page has 1,795 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (consentmanager.net, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 727 KiB and 457 ms of main-thread time.

  • Document request latency

    147 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 94 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 940 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Real visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.3 s

    11.3 s

    Your largest element takes 11.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Scale Incremental Sales Connexity generates $5B in new sale…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 34% slower for real visitors

    +34%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 155 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 155 ms

    155 ms

    Real visitors wait 155 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 33 ms

    33 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 33 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix36
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB in 113 requests

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 113 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (43), scripts 930 KiB (36) and stylesheets 240 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Item-3.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    113 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Case-Study_Bombas.png at 1,080 px wide, shown at 170 px. Resized copies would save about 113 KiB.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (190 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.26 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.26 g of CO₂e: 151.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8991
  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9266
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “Home - Connexity”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("https://www.connexity.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/cnx-logo.svg")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 60 internal links, 25 external

    The homepage links to 60 pages on connexity.com and 25 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.connexity.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.connexity.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.connexity.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (588 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix58
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.connexity.com/insights/uncapped-cpc-budget-overdelivers-on-performance-for-adam-eve, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 5 pages share a title

    /, https://www.connexity.com/fr, https://www.connexity.com/de, https://www.connexity.com/it and https://www.connexity.com/en-gb all use the title “Home - Connexity”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://www.connexity.com/for-retailers, https://www.connexity.com/for-publishers, https://www.connexity.com/insights, https://www.connexity.com/fr, https://www.connexity.com/de and https://www.connexity.com/it and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 7 pages without an H1

    https://www.connexity.com/for-retailers, https://www.connexity.com/for-publishers, https://www.connexity.com/insights, https://www.connexity.com/fr, https://www.connexity.com/de and https://www.connexity.com/it and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix79
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 235 words

    The homepage has only about 235 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get Started”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Close Get started Open Get started”, “Get Started” and “Learn More”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (consentmanager) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: consentmanager

    A consent management tool (consentmanager) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at connexity.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Fastly

Company

Founded
1997
Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on connexity.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25