Website review, no card needed
connexity.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202643 issues · 83 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on connexity.com, 18 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 155 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.4 s
3.0 s
3.6 s
4.1 s
4.7 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
4.7 s32 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.7 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.8 s · 510 KiB66 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (510 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 388 KiBAbout 388 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 897 KiB18 images could be 897 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 99 KiBAbout 99 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 195 ms
195 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 195 ms of main-thread work and 379 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,795 HTML elements
The page has 1,795 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (consentmanager.net, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 727 KiB and 457 ms of main-thread time.
Document request latency
147 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 94 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.8 s
A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 940 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 13 ms
13 msYour server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.3 s
11.3 sYour largest element takes 11.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Scale Incremental Sales Connexity generates $5B in new sale…”.
First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s
6.5 sThe first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 11.5 s
11.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.5 s
7.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 34% slower for real visitors
+34%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 155 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 155 ms
155 msReal visitors wait 155 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 33 ms
33 msScripts block the page for only 33 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.5 MB in 113 requests
4.5 MBYour homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 113 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (43), scripts 930 KiB (36) and stylesheets 240 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
8 images in older formats
8 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Item-3.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images far larger than shown
113 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Case-Study_Bombas.png at 1,080 px wide, shown at 170 px. Resized copies would save about 113 KiB.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (190 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.26 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.26 g of CO₂e: 151.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (16 characters)
Your title is only 16 characters: “Home - Connexity”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("https://www.connexity.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/cnx-logo.svg")”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
60 internal links, 25 external
The homepage links to 60 pages on connexity.com and 25 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.connexity.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.connexity.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.connexity.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (588 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://www.connexity.com/insights/uncapped-cpc-budget-overdelivers-on-performance-for-adam-eve, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
5 pages share a title
/, https://www.connexity.com/fr, https://www.connexity.com/de, https://www.connexity.com/it and https://www.connexity.com/en-gb all use the title “Home - Connexity”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
9 pages without a meta description
https://www.connexity.com/for-retailers, https://www.connexity.com/for-publishers, https://www.connexity.com/insights, https://www.connexity.com/fr, https://www.connexity.com/de and https://www.connexity.com/it and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
7 pages without an H1
https://www.connexity.com/for-retailers, https://www.connexity.com/for-publishers, https://www.connexity.com/insights, https://www.connexity.com/fr, https://www.connexity.com/de and https://www.connexity.com/it and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 small tap targets
10 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 235 words
The homepage has only about 235 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get Started”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Close Get started Open Get started”, “Get Started” and “Learn More”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (consentmanager) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: consentmanager
A consent management tool (consentmanager) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at connexity.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Fastly
Company
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- New York
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on connexity.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.