Website review, no card needed
contractworkplaces.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202646 issues · 106 checks
This review found 46 issues worth fixing on contractworkplaces.com, 20 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 5.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 208 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 207 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 289 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.4 s · 937 KiBAbout 937 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 346 KiB20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (346 KiB).
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 189 KiB1 image could be 189 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s
1.0 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 978 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 32
32/100Your mobile performance score is 32. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.9 s
A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 2.2 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 601 ms
601 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 601 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
400 ms · 54 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 54 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 454 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 68 KiBAbout 68 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 15 ms
15 msYour server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.1 s
15.1 sYour largest element takes 15.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Diseño de oficinas modernas y arquitectura corporativa por …”.
First Contentful Paint: 7.4 s
7.4 sThe first text or image appears after 7.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 21.1 s
21.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 8.0 s
8.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 41% slower for real visitors
+41%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 208 ms to 289 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 61% slower for real visitors
+61%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 5.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 179 ms
179 msReal visitors wait 179 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.01
0.01The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.01, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.4 MB in 145 requests
3.4 MBYour homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 145 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (56), other files 392 KiB (41) and images 296 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
171 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example cw-hero-es.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 171 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (272 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
0.96 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.96 g of CO₂e: 115.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
13 tap targets too small
13 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Links look like plain text
3 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)
Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (43 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 43 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
15 form fields without a label
15 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 39 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
70 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 70 pages on contractworkplaces.com and 7 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “Creamos entornos de trabajo innovadores. Somos líderes en diseño de oficinas y construcción de proyectos llave en mano …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Diseño y construcción de oficinas”.
Title: 45 characters
Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “Expertos en diseño y construcción de oficinas”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://contractworkplaces.com/web/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://contractworkplaces.com/web/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (679 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/web/portfolio/bayer-chile-2022 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages without a meta description
/en and /web/portfolio/bayer-chile-2022 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://id.rlcdn.com/464526.gif.
8 small tap targets
8 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (contractworkplaces.com).
Valid certificate (82 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for contractworkplaces.com and is valid for another 82 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://contractworkplaces.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 47 links work
All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
contractworkplaces.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
contractworkplaces.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 14 years old
14 yearscontractworkplaces.com was registered in Apr 2012 through Domain.com - Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Apr 2027
contractworkplaces.com is registered until Apr 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 691 words of copy
The homepage carries about 691 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
4 short forms
4 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks and 16 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: HubSpot and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:50.6.173.118 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:zcsend.net ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
40 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 40 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 2 plugins are behind their latest release.siteorigin-panels 2.16.11 → 2.38.0 · cookie-law-info 3.2.10 → 3.5.8
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 46 issues on contractworkplaces.com, including 22 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.