Website review, no card needed

contrastsecurity.com logo

contrastsecurity.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202640 issues · 99 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on contrastsecurity.com, 20 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 243.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.6 s
Oct 10, 20263.6 s
Oct 17, 20263.6 s
Oct 24, 20263.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
420 ms211 msMay 9Oct 24348 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026330 ms
May 16, 2026378 ms
May 23, 2026396 ms
May 30, 2026345 ms
Jun 6, 2026314 ms
Jun 13, 2026280 ms
Jun 20, 2026266 ms
Jun 27, 2026266 ms
Jul 4, 2026256 ms
Jul 11, 2026245 ms
Jul 18, 2026248 ms
Jul 25, 2026249 ms
Aug 1, 2026240 ms
Aug 8, 2026235 ms
Aug 15, 2026245 ms
Aug 22, 2026251 ms
Aug 29, 2026261 ms
Sep 5, 2026263 ms
Sep 12, 2026257 ms
Sep 19, 2026250 ms
Sep 26, 2026244 ms
Oct 3, 2026349 ms
Oct 10, 2026363 ms
Oct 17, 2026353 ms
Oct 24, 2026348 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of contrastsecurity.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. contrastsecurity.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. contrastsecurity.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. contrastsecurity.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  4. contrastsecurity.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  5. contrastsecurity.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  6. contrastsecurity.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  7. contrastsecurity.com at 7.2 s7.2 s
  8. contrastsecurity.com at 8.2 s8.2 s

contrastsecurity.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix27
  • Render-blocking requests

    8.1 s

    21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.1 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.2 s · 1.5 MB

    54 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    4.5 s · 669 KiB

    3 images could be 669 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 548 KiB

    About 548 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 822 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 27

    27/100

    Your mobile performance score is 27 (desktop: 34). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Wistia and others), adding 1.3 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.1 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Hotjar adds 470 ms

    470 ms

    Hotjar costs a phone 470 ms of main-thread work and 64 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 62.7 s

    62.7 s

    Your largest element takes 62.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “AI is generating your code. AI is running the attacks. Cont…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 62.7 s

    62.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 62.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 349 ms

    349 ms

    Real visitors wait 349 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 330 ms to 348 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix43
  • Page weight: 19.3 MB in 128 requests

    19.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 19.3 MB in 128 requests on a phone: media 8.2 MB (3), images 4.7 MB (18) and other files 3.9 MB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    650 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example contrast--bg--circle-with-two-feeds_flipped-blur.jpg at 3,000 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 650 KiB.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (794 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.47 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.47 g of CO₂e: 656.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 7890
  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (30 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 30 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Hidden but focusable

    4 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

1 checks passed
  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is long (70 characters)

    Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Runtime Application Security for AI-Generated Code | Contrast Security”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 74 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 74 pages on contrastsecurity.com and 12 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 135 characters

    Your meta description is 135 characters: “Secure AI-generated code with Contrast. Our runtime application security platform observes real behavior to block attac…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Runtime seeswhat AI does.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.contrastsecurity.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.contrastsecurity.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (681 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /platform and /solutions use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /integration, whose canonical is /integrations. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /solutions and /contrast-one have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “headline is not defined”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    34 of 36 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 180 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • security.txt has expired

    Your security.txt expired on 2025-01-01, so researchers may not trust its contact details.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (contrastsecurity.com).

  • Valid certificate (82 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for contrastsecurity.com and is valid for another 82 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://contrastsecurity.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 46 links work

    All 46 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 6 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    contrastsecurity.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 14 years old

    14 years

    contrastsecurity.com was registered in Dec 2011 through Cloudflare, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    contrastsecurity.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Dec 2027

    contrastsecurity.com is registered until Dec 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 487 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 487 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact us” and “Try Contrast”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Pricing” and “Try Contrast”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 exists:%{i}._i.%{d}._d.espf.agari.com include:%{d}.c5.spf-protect.agari.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It loads jQuery 1.11.2, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).

Stack

CMS
HubSpot
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Hosting
HubSpot

Company

Employees
134

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on contrastsecurity.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25