Website review, no card needed
contrastsecurity.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202640 issues · 99 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on contrastsecurity.com, 20 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 330 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 378 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 396 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 345 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 257 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 349 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 363 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 348 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
2.1 s
3.1 s
4.1 s
5.1 s
6.2 s
7.2 s
8.2 s
contrastsecurity.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
8.1 s21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.1 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.2 s · 1.5 MB54 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
4.5 s · 669 KiB3 images could be 669 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 548 KiBAbout 548 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 822 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 27
27/100Your mobile performance score is 27 (desktop: 34). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.5 s
A phone's processor spends 6.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Wistia and others), adding 1.3 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.1 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Hotjar adds 470 ms
470 msHotjar costs a phone 470 ms of main-thread work and 64 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
11 KiBAbout 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 8.4 s
8.4 sThe first text or image appears after 8.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 62.7 s
62.7 sYour largest element takes 62.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “AI is generating your code. AI is running the attacks. Cont…”.
Time to Interactive: 62.7 s
62.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 62.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.3 s
2.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 10.7 s
10.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 349 ms
349 msReal visitors wait 349 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 330 ms to 348 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 19.3 MB in 128 requests
19.3 MBYour homepage downloads 19.3 MB in 128 requests on a phone: media 8.2 MB (3), images 4.7 MB (18) and other files 3.9 MB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
650 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example contrast--bg--circle-with-two-feeds_flipped-blur.jpg at 3,000 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 650 KiB.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (794 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.5 g of CO₂ per visit
5.47 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.47 g of CO₂e: 656.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (30 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 30 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Hidden but focusable
4 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (70 characters)
Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Runtime Application Security for AI-Generated Code | Contrast Security”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
74 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 74 pages on contrastsecurity.com and 12 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 135 characters
Your meta description is 135 characters: “Secure AI-generated code with Contrast. Our runtime application security platform observes real behavior to block attac…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Runtime seeswhat AI does.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.contrastsecurity.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.contrastsecurity.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (681 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
/platform and /solutions use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /integration, whose canonical is /integrations. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
/solutions and /contrast-one have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “headline is not defined”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
34 of 36 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 180 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
security.txt has expired
Your security.txt expired on 2025-01-01, so researchers may not trust its contact details.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (contrastsecurity.com).
Valid certificate (82 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for contrastsecurity.com and is valid for another 82 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://contrastsecurity.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 46 links work
All 46 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 6 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
contrastsecurity.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
3 checks passed
Domain is 14 years old
14 yearscontrastsecurity.com was registered in Dec 2011 through Cloudflare, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
DNSSEC is on
contrastsecurity.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Registered until Dec 2027
contrastsecurity.com is registered until Dec 2027.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 487 words of copy
The homepage carries about 487 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact us” and “Try Contrast”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Pricing” and “Try Contrast”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 exists:%{i}._i.%{d}._d.espf.agari.com include:%{d}.c5.spf-protect.agari.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Osano
A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It loads jQuery 1.11.2, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).
Stack
- CMS
- HubSpot
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
- Hosting
- HubSpot
Company
- Employees
- 134
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on contrastsecurity.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.