cp.com website review

3 images could be 813 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.

About 637 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.

6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

About 89 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

The page has 1,641 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (atlascopco.com, Google Tag Manager and Optanon and others), adding 628 KiB and 490 ms of main-thread time.

11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (115 KiB).

10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 237 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Real visitors wait 4.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

Real visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Real visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Your largest element takes 52.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Compressors & Air Treatment Chicago Pneumatic is your go-to…”.

Visually, the page fills in at 20.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

The page becomes fully interactive after 53.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Real visitors wait 403 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 216 ms to 321 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 585 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

The layout shifts by 0.15 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 9.7 MB in 86 requests on a phone: images 7.5 MB (17), scripts 1.5 MB (30) and fonts 609 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.74 g of CO₂e: 329.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Delayed refresh under 20 hours must not be used: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h6 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

Your meta description is only 17 characters: “Chicago Pneumatic”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

Structured data found (Organization) but with 2 problems, for example “Organization: missing name”.

The homepage links to 33 pages on cp.com and 91 external pages.

Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

/en/sys/in-your-country has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.cp.com/favicon.ico.

The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

Large scripts ship without source maps.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

The homepage has only about 37 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.