Website review, no card needed
crossroads.net website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202650 issues · 90 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on crossroads.net, 23 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
60DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 198 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 202 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 206 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 257 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 203 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.9 s
3.8 s
5.7 s
7.6 s
9.4 s
11.3 s
13.2 s
15.1 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.2 s · 1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.2 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.8 s · 866 KiB48 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (866 KiB).
Main-thread work: 15.7 s
A phone's processor spends 15.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 10.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
osano.com adds 1.2 s
1.2 sosano.com costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 80 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 26
26/100Your mobile performance score is 26 (desktop: 34). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (osano.com, Google Tag Manager and userway.org and others), adding 2.9 MB and 2.5 s of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 2.3 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
900 ms · 175 KiB175 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Improve image delivery
1,006 KiB4 images could be 1,006 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Render-blocking requests
650 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 499 ms
499 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 499 ms of main-thread work and 685 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 65 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 65 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
userway.org adds 236 ms
236 msuserway.org costs a phone 236 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Duplicated JavaScript
170 KiB170 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Reduce unused CSS
117 KiBAbout 117 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 38 ms
38 msYour server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 62.8 s
62.8 sYour largest element takes 62.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “High Five”.
Speed Index: 17.1 s
17.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 8.6 s
8.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 8.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 62.9 s
62.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 62.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s
5.7 sThe first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 240 ms
240 msReal visitors wait 240 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 198 ms to 203 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.10
0.10For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 497 ms
497 msReal visitors wait 497 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 14.9 MB in 263 requests
14.9 MBYour homepage downloads 14.9 MB in 263 requests on a phone: other files 9.3 MB (86), scripts 3.7 MB (97) and images 1.4 MB (35). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
608 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example crds-home-jumbotron-high-five.jpg at 1,694 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 608 KiB.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (737 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.2 g of CO₂ per visit
4.21 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.21 g of CO₂e: 505.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links must have discernible text (2 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text (1 element)
<svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 1 image in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (50 characters)
Your meta description is only 50 characters: “No matter what your beliefs, you are welcome here.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.crossroads.net/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at crossroads.net/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
21 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 21 pages on crossroads.net and 7 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “When Did You Stop Dreaming Big?”.
Title: 64 characters
Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Crossroads Church | A Community for Everyone | Crossroads Church”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.crossroads.net/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
39%The HTML your server sends has 178 of the 457 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/media/tags/parenting is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/media/series/raw/when-did-you-stop-dreaming-big and /media/podcasts/messages/when-did-you-stop-dreaming-big all use the title “When Did You Stop Dreaming Big? | Crossroads Church”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
/media/podcasts/crossroads-daily/jesus-doesnt-play-it-safe-or-mark-1 has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
11 pages share a meta description
/next-step-navigator, /media/articles, /media/podcasts, /media/tags/parenting, /media/topics/culture and /media/topics/self and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
/locations, /next-step-navigator, /media/podcasts/messages/when-did-you-stop-dreaming-big and /media/podcasts/audio-articles/god-wanted-me-to-tell-my-wife-about-my-porn-habit-by-donny-black have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/media/topics/humans-of-crossroads has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.crossroads.net/.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “process is not defined”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 457 words of copy
The homepage carries about 457 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Join us online or in-person”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
26 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Osano
A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at crossroads.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Segment
- Hosting
- Netlify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on crossroads.net, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.