Website review, no card needed
ctutraining.ac.za website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202634 issues · 80 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on ctutraining.ac.za, 12 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71C- #64,534 of 80,630 reviewed websitesbeats 17%
- #34,626 of 39,667 online storesbeats 10%
- #1,493 of 2,105 WooCommerce storesbeats 25%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 235 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 232 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 231 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 233 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 231 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 307 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 336 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 338 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 338 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 343 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.8 s · 612 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (612 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 160 KiBAbout 160 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 71
71/100Your mobile performance score is 71 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 77 KiBAbout 77 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 143 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Azure Web Services and dynamics.com), adding 130 KiB and 69 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 126 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 456 ms
456 msYour server sent the HTML in 456 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sYour largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “EMPOWERING PEOPLE THROUGH EDUCATION View Qualifications Upc…”. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.6 s).
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.4 s
6.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 328 ms
328 msReal visitors wait 328 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 46% slower for real visitors
+46%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 235 ms to 343 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 976 ms
976 msReal visitors wait 976 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 4.7 s
4.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 4.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 38% faster for real visitors
-38%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.8 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 32 ms
32 msScripts block the page for only 32 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit
0.34 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.34 g of CO₂e: 41.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 1.2 MB in 22 requests
1.2 MBYour homepage downloads 1.2 MB in 22 requests on a phone: images 510 KiB (7), fonts 276 KiB (4) and scripts 213 KiB (4). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (1 element).
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 links without text
4 links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Skip links are not focusable.
Skip links are not focusable. (1 element).
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Empowering people” and “through education”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (200 characters)
Your meta description is 200 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
50 internal links, 24 external
The homepage links to 50 pages on ctutraining.ac.za and 24 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 64 characters
Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “IT International Certifications Courses | CTU Training Solutions”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ctutraining.ac.za/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, EducationalOrganization, ImageObject, Organization and Person.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ctutraining.ac.za/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (36 KiB, 196 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
/open-day declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
/ and /open-day all use the title “IT International Certifications Courses | CTU Training Solutions”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
8 pages without a meta description
/february-intake, /contact-us, /compliment-or-feedback, /ctu-campuses, /upcoming-events and /about-us and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://bowstudios.co.za/ (503).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (ctutraining.ac.za).
Valid certificate (71 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for ctutraining.ac.za and is valid for another 71 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://ctutraining.ac.za redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
ctutraining.ac.za has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 518 words of copy
The homepage carries about 518 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Call Us: 0861 100 395” and “Book for Open Day!”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 3 email links.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
ctutraining.ac.za has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
No SPF record
ctutraining.ac.za has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 0/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 34 issues on ctutraining.ac.za, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.